RE: [council] proposed schedule for november icann meeting

["erica.roberts" <erica.roberts@telstra.com>]

Thanks Ken - put me down for the dinner.
erica

>===== Original Message From "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com> =====
>i have been informed that due to a special meeting which has been called
>between icann -iana and the country code administrators, we have been asked
>to revise our meeting schedule for the november names council meeting. i
>talked to louis yesterday and we discussed this tentative schedule
>
>november 14th -tuesday 9am -noon -  general assembly
>1pm thru 4 pm -names council
>
>i am also proposing another names council dinner on the previous night
>(monday november 13th) at approx 7:30 at the chart house restaurant in
>marina del rey (6 minutes from hotel) and have made tentative reservations
>for same
>
>i would appreciate your comments as soon as possible, both on the proposed
>schedule as well as your interest in attending the proposed dinner
>
>thanks
>
>ken
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>
>To: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
>Cc: <mclaughlin@pobox.com>; "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "Elisabeth
>PORTENEUVE" <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>; "Dany Vandromme"
><vandrome@renater.fr>; "Louis Touton" <touton@icann.org>; "names council"
><council@dnso.org>; "roberto gaetano" <R.Gaetano@iaea.org>; "Mike Roberts"
><mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>; "John Crain" <crain@icann.org>
>Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 7:19 AM
>Subject: Re: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21 september
>
>
>> Morning YJ / all
>>
>> Thank you for the opportunity to clarify any confusion ......
>>
>> We need a costing and I have asked John Crain for the price for the
>> Webcasting. NSI have kindly agreed to sponsor the web cast SUBJECT to
>> obtaining an acceptable costing from ICANN/Berkman. If the costs are
>> toooooo great we will need additional sponsors and your offer of
>> assistance is most appreciated YJ. I hope John will be able to come back
>> to us/Roger within a day or two so we can put this issue to behind us.
>> Thanks Roger for helping out.....
>>
>> For future meetings it may be a good idea to set-up a "fund" for remote
>> participation costs so we don't have this predicament at each
>> meeting....
>>
>> As for the room allocation. I have volunteered to be the liaison.....
>>
>> Would EACH constituency please advise me of the capacity of the room,
>> whether they prefer morning or afternoon, the expected duration (eg. ??
>> hours) for their constituency meeting and any "special" facilities
>> required by their constituency for the meeting.
>>
>> Thanks for your help
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> YJ Park wrote:
>>
>> > Andrew and NC members,
>> >
>> > > Please see my attached email of 17 September, which repeats *two*
>earlier
>> > > requests that the Names Council urgently decide (1) whether to webcast
>the
>> > > LA DNSO meetings, and, if so, how to pay for it;  and (2) the schedule
>for
>> > > the LA meetings, and the identity of the scheduling contact.
>> >
>> > I have been a bit confused on whether web cast issue was going to be
>> > discussed
>> > in the budget committee rather than nc as a whole during the
>teleconference.
>> > Since this was tabled due to lack of time, we'd better start to clarify
>each
>> > member's
>> >
>> > (1) yes and no to webcast the LA dnso meetings
>> >      if it turns out yes, let's suggest how to pay for it.
>> >
>> > (2) schedule for the LA meetings and the identity of the scheduling
>contact.
>> >
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > YJ Park, Non-commercial Constituency
>> >
>> > (1) Yes.
>> >       If it is going to be paid by donation by the companies, I will try
>to
>> > raise fund
>> >       among companies in asia area asap. I prefer this option.
>> >       And if it is going to be paid by each constituency, ncc is going
>to
>> > try to share it.
>> >
>> > (2) I'm going to contact John and Paul as ncc contact point within 24
>hrs.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > > If the Names Council does not tomorrow make those decisions, I will
>assume
>> > > that the DNSO will not be meeting in LA, and that no webcast should be
>> > > arranged.
>> >
>> > Hope it's not too late.
>> >
>> > As I proposed a teleconference on Otc. 5 in the review-committee,
>> > another brief teleconference, 20 mins asap might be an option to wrap
>this
>> > up.
>> >
>> > Let's wind this up asap.
>> >
>> > YJ
>> >
>> > > --Andrew
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf
>Of
>> > Ken
>> > > Stubbs
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 10:40 PM
>> > > To: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE; Dany Vandromme; Andrew McLaughlin; Louis
>Touton;
>> > > names council
>> > > Cc: roberto gaetano; Mike Roberts
>> > > Subject: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21 september
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > for some reason the names council teleconference which is scheduled
>for
>> > > tomorrow has not been posted by elisabeth so here goes
>> > >
>> > > date: thurdsay september 21, 2000
>> > > time: 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 cet
>> > >
>> > > telephone number
>> > >
>> > > Then the dial number will be +33-1-41-74-78-83
>> > > No passcode is required
>> > >
>> > > agenda items:
>> > >
>> > > approval of prior meetings minutes
>> > > budget workgroup report roger & erica
>> > > dnso review report- theresa
>> > > financial report from icann staff
>> > > icann staff report
>> > > for status on independent  review panel nominations.
>> > > proxy voting proposal - paul kane
>> > > business constituancy dues problem
>> > > intake committee report
>> > > discussion regarding individual outreach and representation
>> > >
>> > > we have a lot to accomplish here and i plan on starting the conference
>on
>> > > time...
>> > >
>> > > repeat.... 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 CET thursday 21 september
>> > >
>> > > see you on the call..
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >