RE: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21 september

["erica.roberts" <erica.roberts@telstra.com>]

As you may recall, M-IT paid for the last NC meeting web cast.  The cost was 
$US10,000.

erica

>===== Original Message From "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com> =====
>cant be done that day as icann staff & key board members are meeting with
>cctld administrators in late afternoon. this is why the schedule has been
>compressed to the times i proposed
>
>ken
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
>To: "Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>
>Cc: <mclaughlin@pobox.com>; "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "Elisabeth
>PORTENEUVE" <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>; "Dany Vandromme"
><vandrome@renater.fr>; "Louis Touton" <touton@icann.org>; "names council"
><council@dnso.org>; "roberto gaetano" <R.Gaetano@iaea.org>; "Mike Roberts"
><mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>; "John Crain" <crain@icann.org>
>Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 9:19 AM
>Subject: Re: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21 september
>
>
>> Hello Paul and all,
>>
>> It appears things move here.:-)
>> Thanks a lot, Ken and Paul.
>>
>> > We need a costing and I have asked John Crain for the price for the
>> > Webcasting. NSI have kindly agreed to sponsor the web cast SUBJECT to
>> > obtaining an acceptable costing from ICANN/Berkman. If the costs are
>> > toooooo great we will need additional sponsors and your offer of
>> > assistance is most appreciated YJ. I hope John will be able to come back
>> > to us/Roger within a day or two so we can put this issue to behind us.
>> > Thanks Roger for helping out.....
>>
>> This sounds we almost fixed the dnso web cast decision for LA.
>> As you suggested here, I will be happy to get additional sponsors
>> in asia subject to the funding update by John and Roger.
>>
>> > For future meetings it may be a good idea to set-up a "fund" for remote
>> > participation costs so we don't have this predicament at each
>> > meeting....
>>
>> If nc's exsiting budget committee can come up with a long-term plan,
>> this would be a good starting point to discuss and finalise it,
>> hopely until LA meeting.
>>
>> > As for the room allocation. I have volunteered to be the liaison.....
>> >
>> > Would EACH constituency please advise me of the capacity of the room,
>> > whether they prefer morning or afternoon, the expected duration (eg. ??
>> > hours) for their constituency meeting and any "special" facilities
>> > required by their constituency for the meeting.
>>
>> Thanks for your volunteer.
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> Non-Commercial Domain Name Holder's Constituency
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> Date: 2000. 11. 13. Monday
>> Place: Marriot(?)
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> Expected attendees: 60 - 70 (?)
>> Expected time: 9:00 - 18:00
>> Expected facilities: 4 - 5 microphones, LCD Projector
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> NCC is going to have a teleconference too, however,
>> usually the telephone facility has been provided by ncc itself.
>>
>> If further info is needed, please contact me.
>> Thanks again,
>>
>> YJ
>>
>> > Thanks for your help
>> >
>> > Best
>> >
>> > Paul
>> >
>> > YJ Park wrote:
>> >
>> > > Andrew and NC members,
>> > >
>> > > > Please see my attached email of 17 September, which repeats *two*
>> earlier
>> > > > requests that the Names Council urgently decide (1) whether to
>webcast
>> the
>> > > > LA DNSO meetings, and, if so, how to pay for it;  and (2) the
>schedule
>> for
>> > > > the LA meetings, and the identity of the scheduling contact.
>> > >
>> > > I have been a bit confused on whether web cast issue was going to be
>> > > discussed
>> > > in the budget committee rather than nc as a whole during the
>> teleconference.
>> > > Since this was tabled due to lack of time, we'd better start to
>clarify
>> each
>> > > member's
>> > >
>> > > (1) yes and no to webcast the LA dnso meetings
>> > >      if it turns out yes, let's suggest how to pay for it.
>> > >
>> > > (2) schedule for the LA meetings and the identity of the scheduling
>> contact.
>> > >
>> >
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > YJ Park, Non-commercial Constituency
>> > >
>> > > (1) Yes.
>> > >       If it is going to be paid by donation by the companies, I will
>try
>> to
>> > > raise fund
>> > >       among companies in asia area asap. I prefer this option.
>> > >       And if it is going to be paid by each constituency, ncc is going
>> to
>> > > try to share it.
>> > >
>> > > (2) I'm going to contact John and Paul as ncc contact point within 24
>> hrs.
>> >
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > > If the Names Council does not tomorrow make those decisions, I will
>> assume
>> > > > that the DNSO will not be meeting in LA, and that no webcast should
>be
>> > > > arranged.
>> > >
>> > > Hope it's not too late.
>> > >
>> > > As I proposed a teleconference on Otc. 5 in the review-committee,
>> > > another brief teleconference, 20 mins asap might be an option to wrap
>> this
>> > > up.
>> > >
>> > > Let's wind this up asap.
>> > >
>> > > YJ
>> > >
>> > > > --Andrew
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On
>Behalf
>> Of
>> > > Ken
>> > > > Stubbs
>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 10:40 PM
>> > > > To: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE; Dany Vandromme; Andrew McLaughlin; Louis
>> Touton;
>> > > > names council
>> > > > Cc: roberto gaetano; Mike Roberts
>> > > > Subject: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21
>september
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > for some reason the names council teleconference which is scheduled
>> for
>> > > > tomorrow has not been posted by elisabeth so here goes
>> > > >
>> > > > date: thurdsay september 21, 2000
>> > > > time: 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 cet
>> > > >
>> > > > telephone number
>> > > >
>> > > > Then the dial number will be +33-1-41-74-78-83
>> > > > No passcode is required
>> > > >
>> > > > agenda items:
>> > > >
>> > > > approval of prior meetings minutes
>> > > > budget workgroup report roger & erica
>> > > > dnso review report- theresa
>> > > > financial report from icann staff
>> > > > icann staff report
>> > > > for status on independent  review panel nominations.
>> > > > proxy voting proposal - paul kane
>> > > > business constituancy dues problem
>> > > > intake committee report
>> > > > discussion regarding individual outreach and representation
>> > > >
>> > > > we have a lot to accomplish here and i plan on starting the
>conference
>> on
>> > > > time...
>> > > >
>> > > > repeat.... 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 CET thursday 21 september
>> > > >
>> > > > see you on the call..
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>>