Re: [council] NCtelecon 21 September 2000, minutes

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Theresa and Erica, Philip, Caroline, Ken,

> We agreed to the process that occured and was carried out.

"ARE YOU SURE?"

YJ


----- Original Message -----
From: "Theresa Swinehart" <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>
To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; "'Elisabeth Porteneuve'"
<Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>; <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 11:14 PM
Subject: RE: [council] NCtelecon 21 September 2000, minutes


> I agree with Philip comment's. We agreed to the process that occured and
was
> carried out. Had a different process been suggested, I likewise would have
> reacted similarly to Philip's points 1 and 2.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@dnso.org
> > [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> > Philip Sheppard
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 2:58 AM
> > To: Elisabeth Porteneuve; council@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [council] NCtelecon 21 September 2000, minutes
> >
> >
> > Elisabeth,
> > one more correction on the press release.
> > My understanding and I believe that of Paul Kane's and Ken
> > Stubbs, was that
> > Paul and Philip would draft the release between them, check
> > out facts/legal
> > position via Louis and then ask Ken as chair to sign off on
> > it.  That is
> > what we did. We had agreed that a message should be got out quickly.
> >
> > The idea of submitting a press release to be re-edited by the
> > Names Council
> > and for everyone to agree to it was to my understanding not
> > the case. Had
> > that been the case I would:
> > 1. have argued against it - it takes too long and risks the text being
> > changed piecemeal as opposed to a coherent whole written in a style to
> > attract interest from editors
> > 2. probably have withdrawn my offer to draft a release that
> > would be subject
> > to such an editorial board!!!
> >
> > Philip
> >
> >
>