ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Quorum


Further thought on option B

In option B we could add that it will be mandatory that at least one
representative of each constituency should be physically represented, in
that form diversity is maintained.

Regards

Guillermo



-----Mensaje original-----
De: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
Enviado el: Jueves, 05 de Octubre de 2000 11:13 a.m.
Para: names council
Asunto: Re: [council] Quorum


Paul's revised proposal on proxy voting will be discussed at the Oct 19
meeting.

The core question over proxies counting for quorum is as follows:
1. Present rules say quorum is one half = 10 members physically present.

2. Revised option B of the new proposal is one third = 7 members physically
present plus 3 proxies between them.

 Philip



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>