RE: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda

[Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>]

I have to agree, 5:00 am Pacific time isn't reasonable. Nor is incredibly
late in Asia Pacific region. If 6:00 am Pacific stays within a reasonable
time for Asia Pacific (those of you calling in from there, please speak up),
then let's go with 6:00 am.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@dnso.org
> [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> aus der Muhlen, Axel
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 1:55 AM
> To: 'Ken Stubbs'; council@dnso.org
> Cc: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
> Subject: RE: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> Importance: High
>
>
>
> I don't think that the suggested time slot for the Oct. 19 NC telecon
> constitutes a fair compromise -- 5:00 a.m. USA Pacific Time
> is not the best
> time to start your day and unreasonably early.
>
> If we no longer want to rotate time slots, I suggest that we
> adopt Philip's
> suggestion made in his email of Sept. 20  and start our calls
> at 15:00 Paris
> time (which corresponds to 6:00 a.m. USA Pacific Time).  His
> email is pasted
> below.
>
>
> Before we go "crazy" in rotating times we may need to think
> through the
> implications and recognise there may be optimal times to choose.
>
> According to Elisabeth,
> "Axel is in LA.
> The majority of the NC is US East Coast or Europe CET or between.
> Africans are in UTC, Latin Americans like US East Coast.
> Hotta-san is in Tokyo.
> Erica Roberts in Melbourne."
>
> According to the World Time Server which adjusts for summer time,
> http://www.worldtimeserver.com/
> LA is - 9 hours from Paris time and Melbourne is +8 hours.
> So, the best compromise in summer is a 15.00 Paris time,
> being 06.00 LA ,
> 22.00 Tokyo and 23.00 Melbourne. Any other time means someone
> is expected to
> take a call unreasonably early or unreasonably late.
>
> Philip
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@revenue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 7:54 AM
> To: council@dnso.org
> Cc: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
> Subject: Re: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
>
>
> my feeling is that it should be at the same time slot we have
> used before as
> it appears to best suit the global nature of the participants
>
> timeslot shall be as follows
>
> 08:00 usa eastern time
> 14:00 european CET
> 22:00 melbourne time (i believe)
> 21:00 tokyo time
>
> if i am wrong here on the times.. please correct me
>
> ken stubbs
>
> p.s. as a result of the current elections i am taking thte
> liberty of adding
> an additional agenda item to get an update on how the council
> & related
> constituancies (i.e. nii's & katoh's) will be dealing with
> the transition of
> these two new esteemed members of the board.
>
> i would appreciate some sort of " written report" (see caroline.. i am
> taking your suggestions)  to the council from the involved
> constituancies
> for our review prior to the meeting
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aus der Muhlen, Axel" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>
> To: "'Elisabeth Porteneuve'" <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>;
> <council@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 3:24 AM
> Subject: RE: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
>
>
>
> What time?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elisabeth Porteneuve [mailto:Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 12:58 PM
> To: council@dnso.org
> Subject: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
>
>
>
>
> [ from http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20001019.NCtelecon-agenda.html ]
>
> ICANN/DNSO
>
>        DNSO Names Council Teleconference on 19 October 2000 - agenda
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
> 9 October 2000.
>
> This agenda was established according to the agenda
> procedures Version 4,
> August 2000 proposed by the NC Intake Committee, and adopted
> by the NC for 3
> months.
>
> Date, time, phones and webcast
>
>   1. The Names Council teleconference will be held on 19
> October, time TBD,
>      2 hours.
>
>   2. The teleconference bridge will be provided by TBD.
>
>   3. The NC will not be webcast due to budget constraints.
> The phone number
>      will be provided later.
>
> Agenda and related documents
>
> Ken Stubbs will be chairing the NC teleconference.
>
>   1. Approval of the agenda (Ken Stubbs) - 2 min
>
>   2. Approval of the summary of the meeting 21 September (Ken
> Stubbs) - 3
>      min
>
>   3. Matters arising (not forming part of this agenda) (Ken
> Stubbs) - 5 min
>
>   4. NC proxy proposal (Paul Kane) REQUIRES NC DECISION - 10 min
>
>
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20001019.NCproxy-vote.v1.html, Version
>      1, TO BE PROVIDED
>
>   5. Preparation for LA physical meeting Tuesday 14 November,
> Marina del
>      Rey, California: administrative (Paul Kane), agenda (NC
> business plan
>      2001) (Ken Stubbs/Intake Committee) - 15 min
>
>   6. Proposed dates for next meetings: REQUIRES NC DECISION
> (Ken Stubbs) - 5
>      min)
>
>           Teleconference, Thursday 14 December (tentative)
>           Teleconference, Thursday 25 January (tentative)
>
>   7. Submission of Meetings Conduct Report from Intake Committee
>      (P.Sheppard) REQUIRES NC DECISION - 15 min
>
>   8. Review Committee status report:
>
>      Version 2.0 sent on 29 September to the NC and NC-Review
>      http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-review/Arc00/msg00053.html,
>      sent to Constituencies and GA (Theresa Swinehart) - 10 min
>
>   9. Proposal for an NC report on TLDs and intellectual
> property (Roger
>      Cochetti) - 5 min
>
>  10. Budget Committee - status report (Roger Cochetti) - 5 min
>
>  11. Independent Review Panel nomination committee proposals
> - status report
> (K.Stubbs/C.Chicoine) - 5 min
>
>  12. Update on new TLDs (ICANN staff) - 15 min
>
>  13. Openess with respect to teleconferences - Ken Stubbs
>
>  14. Taping & making available by Internet access the Names
> Council meetings
>      (this would eliminate the need for real-time listen-in
> ports, which are
>      not provided with some bridges) - Ken Stubbs
>
>  15. Any New Business (ANB)
>
>  16. Report from the ccTLD's, current status with the Names Council
>
>  17. AOB
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
>                  Information from:  © DNSO Names Council
>