Re: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, start time

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com>]

this is not a negociation dany...

i am trying to help everyone out here and be as responsive as possible.

i have subsequently discovered that the person who has volunteered to take
the minutes of the meeting will only be available at the time period
originally proposed last week (i.e. 08:00 to 10:00 eastern time) so i am
being going to stick with the originally stated time.

thats the decision   08:00 -10:00  october 19th ...

dial up #s and passcodes will be forthcoming
there will be an allowance for 15 "monitor only " lines as well

ken stubbs


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dany Vandromme" <vandrome@renater.fr>
To: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com>
Cc: <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>; "'aus der Muhlen, Axel'"
<Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>; <council@dnso.org>; "'Elisabeth PORTENEUVE'"
<Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, start time


On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Ken Stubbs wrote:

> frankly i really dont care what time we have the call... i am trying to
> accomodate all here. i will wait until  17:00 eastern time this afternoon
> for all comments to come in on the time. at this time i am pre-disposed to
> 09:00 eastern time (6am pacific time)  . i will announce the time shortly
> after 17:00 tonight.
>
> i await any further comments from the members
-
What's is really disturbing, is that it is not possible to stay for good
with a date/time!

I would appreciate we stop renegociating always the time. Such late
renegociation is not compatible with an efficient running of the meetings.
I will suggest in the AOB point that we establish in advance, the NC call
meetings, without renegociation possible less that two or three weeks
before the meeting.

For the 19th, call I can attend from 2:00 pm to 5:00 pm CET, but this is
unusual. My schedule is normally tighter.
-
>
> best wishes to you all
>     ken stubbs
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Theresa Swinehart" <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>
> To: "'aus der Muhlen, Axel'" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>; "'Ken Stubbs'"
> <kstubbs@revenue.com>; <council@dnso.org>
> Cc: "'Elisabeth PORTENEUVE'" <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 3:41 AM
> Subject: RE: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
>
>
> > I have to agree, 5:00 am Pacific time isn't reasonable. Nor is
incredibly
> > late in Asia Pacific region. If 6:00 am Pacific stays within a
reasonable
> > time for Asia Pacific (those of you calling in from there, please speak
> up),
> > then let's go with 6:00 am.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-council@dnso.org
> > > [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> > > aus der Muhlen, Axel
> > > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 1:55 AM
> > > To: 'Ken Stubbs'; council@dnso.org
> > > Cc: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
> > > Subject: RE: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> > > Importance: High
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't think that the suggested time slot for the Oct. 19 NC telecon
> > > constitutes a fair compromise -- 5:00 a.m. USA Pacific Time
> > > is not the best
> > > time to start your day and unreasonably early.
> > >
> > > If we no longer want to rotate time slots, I suggest that we
> > > adopt Philip's
> > > suggestion made in his email of Sept. 20  and start our calls
> > > at 15:00 Paris
> > > time (which corresponds to 6:00 a.m. USA Pacific Time).  His
> > > email is pasted
> > > below.
> > >
> > >
> > > Before we go "crazy" in rotating times we may need to think
> > > through the
> > > implications and recognise there may be optimal times to choose.
> > >
> > > According to Elisabeth,
> > > "Axel is in LA.
> > > The majority of the NC is US East Coast or Europe CET or between.
> > > Africans are in UTC, Latin Americans like US East Coast.
> > > Hotta-san is in Tokyo.
> > > Erica Roberts in Melbourne."
> > >
> > > According to the World Time Server which adjusts for summer time,
> > > http://www.worldtimeserver.com/
> > > LA is - 9 hours from Paris time and Melbourne is +8 hours.
> > > So, the best compromise in summer is a 15.00 Paris time,
> > > being 06.00 LA ,
> > > 22.00 Tokyo and 23.00 Melbourne. Any other time means someone
> > > is expected to
> > > take a call unreasonably early or unreasonably late.
> > >
> > > Philip
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@revenue.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 7:54 AM
> > > To: council@dnso.org
> > > Cc: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
> > > Subject: Re: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> > >
> > >
> > > my feeling is that it should be at the same time slot we have
> > > used before as
> > > it appears to best suit the global nature of the participants
> > >
> > > timeslot shall be as follows
> > >
> > > 08:00 usa eastern time
> > > 14:00 european CET
> > > 22:00 melbourne time (i believe)
> > > 21:00 tokyo time
> > >
> > > if i am wrong here on the times.. please correct me
> > >
> > > ken stubbs
> > >
> > > p.s. as a result of the current elections i am taking thte
> > > liberty of adding
> > > an additional agenda item to get an update on how the council
> > > & related
> > > constituancies (i.e. nii's & katoh's) will be dealing with
> > > the transition of
> > > these two new esteemed members of the board.
> > >
> > > i would appreciate some sort of " written report" (see caroline.. i am
> > > taking your suggestions)  to the council from the involved
> > > constituancies
> > > for our review prior to the meeting
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "aus der Muhlen, Axel" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>
> > > To: "'Elisabeth Porteneuve'" <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>;
> > > <council@dnso.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 3:24 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What time?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Elisabeth Porteneuve [mailto:Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 12:58 PM
> > > To: council@dnso.org
> > > Subject: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [ from http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20001019.NCtelecon-agenda.html ]
> > >
> > > ICANN/DNSO
> > >
> > >        DNSO Names Council Teleconference on 19 October 2000 - agenda
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------
> > >
> > > 9 October 2000.
> > >
> > > This agenda was established according to the agenda
> > > procedures Version 4,
> > > August 2000 proposed by the NC Intake Committee, and adopted
> > > by the NC for 3
> > > months.
> > >
> > > Date, time, phones and webcast
> > >
> > >   1. The Names Council teleconference will be held on 19
> > > October, time TBD,
> > >      2 hours.
> > >
> > >   2. The teleconference bridge will be provided by TBD.
> > >
> > >   3. The NC will not be webcast due to budget constraints.
> > > The phone number
> > >      will be provided later.
> > >
> > > Agenda and related documents
> > >
> > > Ken Stubbs will be chairing the NC teleconference.
> > >
> > >   1. Approval of the agenda (Ken Stubbs) - 2 min
> > >
> > >   2. Approval of the summary of the meeting 21 September (Ken
> > > Stubbs) - 3
> > >      min
> > >
> > >   3. Matters arising (not forming part of this agenda) (Ken
> > > Stubbs) - 5 min
> > >
> > >   4. NC proxy proposal (Paul Kane) REQUIRES NC DECISION - 10 min
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20001019.NCproxy-vote.v1.html, Version
> > >      1, TO BE PROVIDED
> > >
> > >   5. Preparation for LA physical meeting Tuesday 14 November,
> > > Marina del
> > >      Rey, California: administrative (Paul Kane), agenda (NC
> > > business plan
> > >      2001) (Ken Stubbs/Intake Committee) - 15 min
> > >
> > >   6. Proposed dates for next meetings: REQUIRES NC DECISION
> > > (Ken Stubbs) - 5
> > >      min)
> > >
> > >           Teleconference, Thursday 14 December (tentative)
> > >           Teleconference, Thursday 25 January (tentative)
> > >
> > >   7. Submission of Meetings Conduct Report from Intake Committee
> > >      (P.Sheppard) REQUIRES NC DECISION - 15 min
> > >
> > >   8. Review Committee status report:
> > >
> > >      Version 2.0 sent on 29 September to the NC and NC-Review
> > >      http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-review/Arc00/msg00053.html,
> > >      sent to Constituencies and GA (Theresa Swinehart) - 10 min
> > >
> > >   9. Proposal for an NC report on TLDs and intellectual
> > > property (Roger
> > >      Cochetti) - 5 min
> > >
> > >  10. Budget Committee - status report (Roger Cochetti) - 5 min
> > >
> > >  11. Independent Review Panel nomination committee proposals
> > > - status report
> > > (K.Stubbs/C.Chicoine) - 5 min
> > >
> > >  12. Update on new TLDs (ICANN staff) - 15 min
> > >
> > >  13. Openess with respect to teleconferences - Ken Stubbs
> > >
> > >  14. Taping & making available by Internet access the Names
> > > Council meetings
> > >      (this would eliminate the need for real-time listen-in
> > > ports, which are
> > >      not provided with some bridges) - Ken Stubbs
> > >
> > >  15. Any New Business (ANB)
> > >
> > >  16. Report from the ccTLD's, current status with the Names Council
> > >
> > >  17. AOB
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------
> > >
> > >                  Information from:  © DNSO Names Council
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------