ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, start time


On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Ken Stubbs wrote:

> this is not a negociation dany...
> 
> i am trying to help everyone out here and be as responsive as possible.
> 
> i have subsequently discovered that the person who has volunteered to take
> the minutes of the meeting will only be available at the time period
> originally proposed last week (i.e. 08:00 to 10:00 eastern time) so i am
> being going to stick with the originally stated time.
-
fine for me!
We should really try to get that scheduling problem resolved straight in
advance for all subsequent meetings!
-
> 
> thats the decision   08:00 -10:00  october 19th ...
> 
> dial up #s and passcodes will be forthcoming
> there will be an allowance for 15 "monitor only " lines as well
> 
> ken stubbs
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dany Vandromme" <vandrome@renater.fr>
> To: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com>
> Cc: <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>; "'aus der Muhlen, Axel'"
> <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>; <council@dnso.org>; "'Elisabeth PORTENEUVE'"
> <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 11:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, start time
> 
> 
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Ken Stubbs wrote:
> 
> > frankly i really dont care what time we have the call... i am trying to
> > accomodate all here. i will wait until  17:00 eastern time this afternoon
> > for all comments to come in on the time. at this time i am pre-disposed to
> > 09:00 eastern time (6am pacific time)  . i will announce the time shortly
> > after 17:00 tonight.
> >
> > i await any further comments from the members
> -
> What's is really disturbing, is that it is not possible to stay for good
> with a date/time!
> 
> I would appreciate we stop renegociating always the time. Such late
> renegociation is not compatible with an efficient running of the meetings.
> I will suggest in the AOB point that we establish in advance, the NC call
> meetings, without renegociation possible less that two or three weeks
> before the meeting.
> 
> For the 19th, call I can attend from 2:00 pm to 5:00 pm CET, but this is
> unusual. My schedule is normally tighter.
> -
> >
> > best wishes to you all
> >     ken stubbs
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Theresa Swinehart" <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>
> > To: "'aus der Muhlen, Axel'" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>; "'Ken Stubbs'"
> > <kstubbs@revenue.com>; <council@dnso.org>
> > Cc: "'Elisabeth PORTENEUVE'" <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 3:41 AM
> > Subject: RE: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> >
> >
> > > I have to agree, 5:00 am Pacific time isn't reasonable. Nor is
> incredibly
> > > late in Asia Pacific region. If 6:00 am Pacific stays within a
> reasonable
> > > time for Asia Pacific (those of you calling in from there, please speak
> > up),
> > > then let's go with 6:00 am.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-council@dnso.org
> > > > [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> > > > aus der Muhlen, Axel
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 1:55 AM
> > > > To: 'Ken Stubbs'; council@dnso.org
> > > > Cc: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
> > > > Subject: RE: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> > > > Importance: High
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't think that the suggested time slot for the Oct. 19 NC telecon
> > > > constitutes a fair compromise -- 5:00 a.m. USA Pacific Time
> > > > is not the best
> > > > time to start your day and unreasonably early.
> > > >
> > > > If we no longer want to rotate time slots, I suggest that we
> > > > adopt Philip's
> > > > suggestion made in his email of Sept. 20  and start our calls
> > > > at 15:00 Paris
> > > > time (which corresponds to 6:00 a.m. USA Pacific Time).  His
> > > > email is pasted
> > > > below.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Before we go "crazy" in rotating times we may need to think
> > > > through the
> > > > implications and recognise there may be optimal times to choose.
> > > >
> > > > According to Elisabeth,
> > > > "Axel is in LA.
> > > > The majority of the NC is US East Coast or Europe CET or between.
> > > > Africans are in UTC, Latin Americans like US East Coast.
> > > > Hotta-san is in Tokyo.
> > > > Erica Roberts in Melbourne."
> > > >
> > > > According to the World Time Server which adjusts for summer time,
> > > > http://www.worldtimeserver.com/
> > > > LA is - 9 hours from Paris time and Melbourne is +8 hours.
> > > > So, the best compromise in summer is a 15.00 Paris time,
> > > > being 06.00 LA ,
> > > > 22.00 Tokyo and 23.00 Melbourne. Any other time means someone
> > > > is expected to
> > > > take a call unreasonably early or unreasonably late.
> > > >
> > > > Philip
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@revenue.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 7:54 AM
> > > > To: council@dnso.org
> > > > Cc: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE
> > > > Subject: Re: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > my feeling is that it should be at the same time slot we have
> > > > used before as
> > > > it appears to best suit the global nature of the participants
> > > >
> > > > timeslot shall be as follows
> > > >
> > > > 08:00 usa eastern time
> > > > 14:00 european CET
> > > > 22:00 melbourne time (i believe)
> > > > 21:00 tokyo time
> > > >
> > > > if i am wrong here on the times.. please correct me
> > > >
> > > > ken stubbs
> > > >
> > > > p.s. as a result of the current elections i am taking thte
> > > > liberty of adding
> > > > an additional agenda item to get an update on how the council
> > > > & related
> > > > constituancies (i.e. nii's & katoh's) will be dealing with
> > > > the transition of
> > > > these two new esteemed members of the board.
> > > >
> > > > i would appreciate some sort of " written report" (see caroline.. i am
> > > > taking your suggestions)  to the council from the involved
> > > > constituancies
> > > > for our review prior to the meeting
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "aus der Muhlen, Axel" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>
> > > > To: "'Elisabeth Porteneuve'" <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>;
> > > > <council@dnso.org>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 3:24 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What time?
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Elisabeth Porteneuve [mailto:Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 12:58 PM
> > > > To: council@dnso.org
> > > > Subject: [council] NCtelecon 19 October 2000, agenda
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [ from http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20001019.NCtelecon-agenda.html ]
> > > >
> > > > ICANN/DNSO
> > > >
> > > >        DNSO Names Council Teleconference on 19 October 2000 - agenda
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ----------
> > > >
> > > > 9 October 2000.
> > > >
> > > > This agenda was established according to the agenda
> > > > procedures Version 4,
> > > > August 2000 proposed by the NC Intake Committee, and adopted
> > > > by the NC for 3
> > > > months.
> > > >
> > > > Date, time, phones and webcast
> > > >
> > > >   1. The Names Council teleconference will be held on 19
> > > > October, time TBD,
> > > >      2 hours.
> > > >
> > > >   2. The teleconference bridge will be provided by TBD.
> > > >
> > > >   3. The NC will not be webcast due to budget constraints.
> > > > The phone number
> > > >      will be provided later.
> > > >
> > > > Agenda and related documents
> > > >
> > > > Ken Stubbs will be chairing the NC teleconference.
> > > >
> > > >   1. Approval of the agenda (Ken Stubbs) - 2 min
> > > >
> > > >   2. Approval of the summary of the meeting 21 September (Ken
> > > > Stubbs) - 3
> > > >      min
> > > >
> > > >   3. Matters arising (not forming part of this agenda) (Ken
> > > > Stubbs) - 5 min
> > > >
> > > >   4. NC proxy proposal (Paul Kane) REQUIRES NC DECISION - 10 min
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20001019.NCproxy-vote.v1.html, Version
> > > >      1, TO BE PROVIDED
> > > >
> > > >   5. Preparation for LA physical meeting Tuesday 14 November,
> > > > Marina del
> > > >      Rey, California: administrative (Paul Kane), agenda (NC
> > > > business plan
> > > >      2001) (Ken Stubbs/Intake Committee) - 15 min
> > > >
> > > >   6. Proposed dates for next meetings: REQUIRES NC DECISION
> > > > (Ken Stubbs) - 5
> > > >      min)
> > > >
> > > >           Teleconference, Thursday 14 December (tentative)
> > > >           Teleconference, Thursday 25 January (tentative)
> > > >
> > > >   7. Submission of Meetings Conduct Report from Intake Committee
> > > >      (P.Sheppard) REQUIRES NC DECISION - 15 min
> > > >
> > > >   8. Review Committee status report:
> > > >
> > > >      Version 2.0 sent on 29 September to the NC and NC-Review
> > > >      http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-review/Arc00/msg00053.html,
> > > >      sent to Constituencies and GA (Theresa Swinehart) - 10 min
> > > >
> > > >   9. Proposal for an NC report on TLDs and intellectual
> > > > property (Roger
> > > >      Cochetti) - 5 min
> > > >
> > > >  10. Budget Committee - status report (Roger Cochetti) - 5 min
> > > >
> > > >  11. Independent Review Panel nomination committee proposals
> > > > - status report
> > > > (K.Stubbs/C.Chicoine) - 5 min
> > > >
> > > >  12. Update on new TLDs (ICANN staff) - 15 min
> > > >
> > > >  13. Openess with respect to teleconferences - Ken Stubbs
> > > >
> > > >  14. Taping & making available by Internet access the Names
> > > > Council meetings
> > > >      (this would eliminate the need for real-time listen-in
> > > > ports, which are
> > > >      not provided with some bridges) - Ken Stubbs
> > > >
> > > >  15. Any New Business (ANB)
> > > >
> > > >  16. Report from the ccTLD's, current status with the Names Council
> > > >
> > > >  17. AOB
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ----------
> > > >
> > > >                  Information from:  © DNSO Names Council
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
> 
>                 Reseau National de Telecommunications
>          pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
> 
>                                   |  ENSAM
> Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
> E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications 
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>