[council] Re: [nc-intake] LA agenda

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Philip wrote on Oct. 16

> So before LA we must write them. Will you do a first draft? I am happy to
> provide second step editing !!

First of all, thanks a lot for your hard works here, Philip.

> So, the LA agenda could be:
> 1. First results of Review process.
> 2. Outline Business Plan and discussion on detail.
> 3. Announcement of UDRP task force, draft terms of reference, refinements
of
> those terms

Philip wrote on Oct. 20 after NC teleconference

> I. Result of DNSO Review Questionnaire
> II. Names Council Business Plan
> III. (Possible) NC Report on New TLDs and IP
> IV. New TLDs and Whois

I want to clarify couple of things here regarding agenda items before we
settle.

1. How do we decide who are which constituency?
    i.e. I have clearly expressed every committee should have each different
    constituency member to have more balanced views.

From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 9:06 AM

> Plus, to reflect all the different perspectives from "seven"
constituencies,
> I suggest from now on all the various committtees within the Names Council
> should include each representative from each constituency in a more open
> and transparent manner except thir clear expression of non-involvement.

    However, it's still unclear who are in the committee on New TLDs and IP.
    Pointing out that every committee has to include each constituency
    representative especially the request is made clearly and I hereby noted
    that NCC wants to be in this committee. This will be consulted with
other
    NCC adcom members and as a default, you can count me in.

2. The Boundary should be pre-articulated before we discuss Whois

    There have been many worries on ICANN's mission creep and this might
    be a critical moment that ICANN should establish a line of demarcation.

    Therefore, I would like to suggest that this committee should describe
    its methodology which will prevent ICANN's unconscious or conscious
    governance expansion.

    Plus, NCC also want to work in this committee with the same condition.