ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Re: [nc-intake] LA agenda


> 1. How do we decide who are which constituency?

=> Correction: "Who are in Which Committee in the Names Council?"

YJ

>     i.e. I have clearly expressed every committee should have each
different
>     constituency member to have more balanced views.
>
> From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 9:06 AM
>
> > Plus, to reflect all the different perspectives from "seven"
> constituencies,
> > I suggest from now on all the various committtees within the Names
Council
> > should include each representative from each constituency in a more open
> > and transparent manner except thir clear expression of non-involvement.
>
>     However, it's still unclear who are in the committee on New TLDs and
IP.
>     Pointing out that every committee has to include each constituency
>     representative especially the request is made clearly and I hereby
noted
>     that NCC wants to be in this committee. This will be consulted with
> other
>     NCC adcom members and as a default, you can count me in.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>