<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Time of Nc calls
I think the time should be moved to 4pm EST for the JANUARY call... BUT not for
the next call.- (19th Dec) as many of us already have commitments.
Can we make sure it is on the agenda for the 19th tel conf that the time of the
next (and subsequent) meeting is more suitable for our PSTcolleagues.
Best
Paul
Peter de Blanc wrote:
> dec 19, 4:00 PM Eastern Standard is OK with me
>
> peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Digitel - Ken Stubbs
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 5:07 AM
> To: aus der Muhlen, Axel; 'Elisabeth Porteneuve'
> Cc: council@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [council] Time of Nc calls
>
> i have no problem with this schedule change but would appreciate input from
> other council members in the next 24 hours
>
> ken stubbs
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aus der Muhlen, Axel" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>
> To: "'Ken Stubbs'" <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "'Elisabeth Porteneuve'"
> <IMCEAMAILTO-Elisabeth+2EPorteneuve+40cetp+2Eipsl+2Efr@mpaa.org>
> Cc: <council@dnso.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:04 PM
> Subject: FW: [council] Time of Nc calls
>
> >
> > I, again, request that the next conference call on December 19 be
> scheduled
> > for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast. As indicated in my previous email,
> scheduling
> > the call for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast ensures that during Northern
> Hemisphere
> > winter time everybody is within the 06.00 - 23.00 window recommended by
> the
> > Intake Committee.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aus der Muhlen, Axel
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 7:15 PM
> > To: 'Philip Sheppard'; council@dnso.org
> > Subject: RE: [council] Time of Nc calls
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I believe that can be achieved also during Northern Hemisphere winter
> time.
> > Note that I suggested to schedule the conference call for 4:00 p.m. US
> East
> > Coast, thus 1:00 p.m., not 6:00 a.m., California.
> >
> > If the conference call is scheduled for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast, the
> > corresponding local times would be as follows:
> >
> > California, USA 1:00 p.m.
> > Missouri, USA 3:00 p.m.
> > Monterrey, Mexico 3:00 p.m.
> > Washington DC, USA 4:00 p.m.
> > St.Thomas, Virgin Islands 5:00 p.m.
> > Santiago, Chile 6:00 p.m.
> > Buenos Aires, Argentina 6:00 p.m.
> > Nouakchott, Mauritania 9:00 p.m.
> > London, United Kingdom 9:00 p.m.
> > Brussels, Belgium 10:00 p.m.
> > Barcelona, Spain 10:00 p.m.
> > Frankfurt, Germany 10:00 p.m.
> > Paris, France 10:00 p.m.
> > Seoul, Korea 6:00 a.m.
> > Tokyo, Japan 6:00 a.m.
> > Melbourne, Australia 8:00 a.m.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Philip Sheppard [ mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be
> > <mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be> ]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 3:36 AM
> > To: council@dnso.org
> > Subject: [council] Time of Nc calls
> >
> >
> > In reply to Axel's request to re schedule the NC call to a more socialble
> > hour in California (currently 5.00 am), Axel referred to the Intake
> > Committee suggestion in the report adopted by the NC that call should
> > ideally be scheduled to be no earlier than 06.00 and no later than 23.00
> in
> > any time zone.
> >
> > I am afraid to say that the Intake Committee was guilty of operating on
> > Northern Hemisphere summer time, where the 06.00 - 23.00 window is
> > achievable between California and Melbourne.
> >
> > Unfortunately the combination of winter time in the Northern Hemisphere
> and
> > Melbourne daylight saving time, means the window is wider in Northern
> > Hemisphere winter months. The consequence of shifting to 06.00 in
> California
> > is now 01.00 in Melbourne.
> >
> > I think the 06.00 - 23.00 window should indeed be an objective but clearly
> > we need to operate differently during some months of the year. Apologies
> > that the Intake Committee had not foreseen this problem earlier.
> >
> > Philip.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|