<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: RE: [council] Time of Nc calls
I have no problem with change in time.
------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
Originally From: "Guillermo Carey C." <gcarey@carey.cl>
Subject: RE: [council] Time of Nc calls
Date: 12/15/2000 09:25am
I have no problem.
Saludos
Guillermo
-----Mensaje original-----
De: kstubbs@digitel.net [mailto:kstubbs@digitel.net]
Enviado el: Viernes, 15 de Diciembre de 2000 05:07 a.m.
Para: aus der Muhlen, Axel; 'Elisabeth Porteneuve'
CC: council@dnso.org
Asunto: Re: [council] Time of Nc calls
i have no problem with this schedule change but would appreciate input
from
other council members in the next 24 hours
ken stubbs
----- Original Message -----
From: "aus der Muhlen, Axel" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>
To: "'Ken Stubbs'" <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "'Elisabeth Porteneuve'"
<IMCEAMAILTO-Elisabeth+2EPorteneuve+40cetp+2Eipsl+2Efr@mpaa.org>
Cc: <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:04 PM
Subject: FW: [council] Time of Nc calls
>
> I, again, request that the next conference call on December 19 be
scheduled
> for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast. As indicated in my previous email,
scheduling
> the call for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast ensures that during Northern
Hemisphere
> winter time everybody is within the 06.00 - 23.00 window
recommended by
the
> Intake Committee.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aus der Muhlen, Axel
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 7:15 PM
> To: 'Philip Sheppard'; council@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [council] Time of Nc calls
>
>
>
>
> I believe that can be achieved also during Northern Hemisphere
winter
time.
> Note that I suggested to schedule the conference call for 4:00 p.m.
US
East
> Coast, thus 1:00 p.m., not 6:00 a.m., California.
>
> If the conference call is scheduled for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast, the
> corresponding local times would be as follows:
>
> California, USA 1:00 p.m.
> Missouri, USA 3:00 p.m.
> Monterrey, Mexico 3:00 p.m.
> Washington DC, USA 4:00 p.m.
> St.Thomas, Virgin Islands 5:00 p.m.
> Santiago, Chile 6:00 p.m.
> Buenos Aires, Argentina 6:00 p.m.
> Nouakchott, Mauritania 9:00 p.m.
> London, United Kingdom 9:00 p.m.
> Brussels, Belgium 10:00 p.m.
> Barcelona, Spain 10:00 p.m.
> Frankfurt, Germany 10:00 p.m.
> Paris, France 10:00 p.m.
> Seoul, Korea 6:00
a.m.
> Tokyo, Japan 6:00 a.m.
> Melbourne, Australia 8:00 a.m.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Sheppard [ mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be
> <mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be> ]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 3:36 AM
> To: council@dnso.org
> Subject: [council] Time of Nc calls
>
>
> In reply to Axel's request to re schedule the NC call to a more
socialble
> hour in California (currently 5.00 am), Axel referred to the Intake
> Committee suggestion in the report adopted by the NC that call
should
> ideally be scheduled to be no earlier than 06.00 and no later than
23.00
in
> any time zone.
>
> I am afraid to say that the Intake Committee was guilty of operating
on
> Northern Hemisphere summer time, where the 06.00 - 23.00 window is
> achievable between California and Melbourne.
>
> Unfortunately the combination of winter time in the Northern
Hemisphere
and
> Melbourne daylight saving time, means the window is wider in
Northern
> Hemisphere winter months. The consequence of shifting to 06.00 in
California
> is now 01.00 in Melbourne.
>
> I think the 06.00 - 23.00 window should indeed be an objective but
clearly
> we need to operate differently during some months of the year.
Apologies
> that the Intake Committee had not foreseen this problem earlier.
>
> Philip.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|