Re: [council] Draft minutes of NCtelecon, 24 Jan 2001, forvalidation by the NC

["Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

Thank you for these corrections - I have been on the move lately and have
had difficulty getting connected.
It is also my recollection that I proposed the motion  and suggest that the
minutes be changed to reflect this.

erica
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dany Vandromme" <vandrome@renater.fr>
To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; "DNSO Council (Public
archive)" <council@dnso.org>; "DNSO Secretariat" <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [council] Draft minutes of NCtelecon, 24 Jan 2001,
forvalidation by the NC


> Please find below a possible addition to be sure that everyone understand
> the same thing
> Dany
> ================
>
>
>
> on 12/02/01 12:15, Philip Sheppard at philip.sheppard@aim.be wrote:
>
> > I have one proposed change to the minutes of 24 January:
> >
> > Decision D3 on approval of NC minutes
> > :
> > I am not sure the proposed time table captured what Erica had proposed.
> > I believe we agreed to this:
> >
> > 1. Within seven days of an NC meeting, the Secretariat will forward
draft
> > summary to the NC Chair
> > 2. Within 10 days of the meeting, the Chair will approve the draft and
> > request the Secretariat to circulate the draft summary to NC members for
> > comment and approval. If no comment is received within seven days
> of the draft circulation date,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > the
> > minutes will be deemed to have been approved for posting.
> > 3. All comments received from NC members will be incorporated in the
summary
> > unless there are objections from other NC members.
> > 4. Where there are objections, the Chair will attempt to resolve the
issue
> > (by reference to the audio transcript if any) and secure agreement from
the
> > relevant NC members. If agreement is not achieved, the Chair will
determine
> > the final version of the minutes and may note areas in which agreement
has
> > not been achieved.
> > 5. The Chair will ensure the above procedure is complete and an approved
> > version of the summary is circulated and made public within 21 days of
the
> > relevant meeting.
> > 6. In accord with by law III-2(a) the formal approval of the summary
will be
> > at the following meeting of the Names Council.
> >
> >
> > Philip
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
>
>                 Reseau National de Telecommunications
>          pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
>
>                                   |  ENSAM
> Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
> E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>