ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Draft minutes of NCtelecon, 24 Jan 2001, for validation by the NC


Hello Maca and council members,

Can you please update my withdrawal as I requested earlier?
Review TF has been triying to be more organized these days however,
the record should be recorded correctly as of January 24 for the future.

From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: "Maca Jamin" <Maca.Jamin@wanadoo.fr>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Re: [council] Further Recommendation on DNSO
Review Report version 1.0

> Hello Maca,
>
> To avoid further miscommunication, let me more clarify what I have asked.
>
> My withdrawal is related with comment on Theresa.
>
> However, other objective comment should be remaining such as lack of
> procedure and so on.
>
> Thanks,
> YJ

=================================================
Therefore, my concerns in lack of "open process" and "formal channel of
discussion" in the Review TF were not withdrawn at all.
=================================================

> Subsequent to the meeting Y.J. Park has sent her apologies and asked to
withdraw
> the observation (see above) she made at this point at the meeting.

So, your description above can bring misunderstanding to
those who have had little background on this process.

Thank you,
YJ



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>