Re: [council] gTLD CONSTITUENCY RESOLUTION

["Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>]

Roger:
I need some clarification.

As I understand this resolution, you are simply asking ICANN to follow
its own constitution, by assigning to the DNSO the evaluation of the 
policy and business aspects of new TLDs, and assigning to the PSO the 
evaluation of the technical aspects. 

Therefore, it would seem that you are asking us to reject the structure 
of the "multidisciplinary task force" proposed by ICANN management (3 
Names Council, 2 IETF and IAB, 1 RSAC).

Is that correct?

>>> "Cochetti, Roger" <RCochetti@verisign.com> 06/13/01 12:04PM >>>
YJ and Council-

Here is the resolution put forward by the gTLD Constituency at the last
meeting of the Names Council.

Roger

Roger J. Cochetti
Senior Vice President & Chief Policy Officer
VeriSign
rcochetti@verisign.com 
(703) 326-2585/202-973-6600




-----Original Message-----
From: YJ Park [mailto:yjpark@myepark.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:45 PM
To: council@dnso.org 
Subject: [council] gTLD resolution on the New TLD Evauation Process
Planning TF


Council Members,

Volunteering to be a member of New TLD evaluation TF,
I would like to discuss several points before NC meeting
before June 29.

Some NC members have already pointed out some issues in
the draft resolution distributed in the Stockholm NC meeting.

Roger, can you distribute the draft resolution in the mailing list?
I cannot find such document yet. Did I miss it?

What I do remember was the composure of Evaluation Task
Force which sounded very closed unnecessarily.

YJ