ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] dnso Secretariat Services


Erica,

If I can't hear any objection regarding this,
this document will be sent to GA within six hours from  now on.

Thanks,
YJ

> Thank you, Erica, for sharing this document.
> I noted that the schedule was alreday behind the proposed one.
>
> BTW, can you distribute this document to the GA?
> I think they do have a right to be exposed to this document, too
> as stakeholders.
>
> YJ
>
> > Hi YJ,
> >
> > I welcome the opportunity to clarify:
> > The RFP is open for a two week period.  The  Search Committe report
> > presented at the last ICANN (see attached) indicates the schedule for
the
> > next steps.
> >
> > The consultant (Ian Peter and Associates) is responsible for
shortlisting
> > against agreed selection criteria and will rank shortlisted candidates.
> The
> > ranking will include a short explanation of candidates respective
> strengths
> > and weaknesses and will be provided to the Search Committee.  The Search
> > Committee will consider the ranking provided by theconsultant and
> recommend
> > a candidate for appointment by the NC.  The appointment is to be made by
> the
> > NC.
> >
> > erica
> >
> > .
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
> > To: <council@dnso.org>
> > Cc: "Ian Peter" <ianpsinbox@hotmail.com>
> > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: [council] dnso Secretariat Services
> >
> >
> > > Thank you, Erica.
> > >
> > > Regarding this matter, let me clarify some points with you.
> > >
> > > Is it normal practice for people to have five days or so
> > > to prepare a proposal for secretariat or entiy?
> > >
> > > Since this is DNSO secretariat, can you share what will be
> > > the next steps with its timelines and who are going to decide
> > > the secretariat on behalf of DNSO?
> > >
> > > Search Committee composed of 4 or so people?
> > > NC?
> > > GA and NC?
> > >
> > > It's all unclear to me.
> > >
> > > I know the concept of efficiency, however, transparency is also
> > > important. When DNSO decides its own secretariat, I think it
> > > should invite more participation and guidance.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > YJ
> > >
> > >
> > > > I would appreciate it if all Council members would draw the
attention
> of
> > > > their constituency to the RFP currently out for DNSO Secretariat
> > Services.
> > > > This can be found at:
> > > > http://www.dnso.org/secretariat/2001.RFP-DNSO.html
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > erica
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>