Re: [council] Search Committee report

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Vany,

> Please remember that I made a sumary of the reports that Chuck, Philip and
> I. Such sumary was submited to Chuck and Philip, for their review.
> However Philip oposed
> that I circulate such sumary to the Search Comite (language barrier). For
> Chuck it was OK.
>
> I think that such a sumary is the nearest approach that exists right now
> and if all of you are agree, I can send such a sumary I made.

I am interested in reading your summary to get more background
information. The discussion wrt DNSO Secretariat we have had yesterday
was very limited and it was quite difficult to figure out what has been
going on.

I don't think Philip shared the shortlisted three interviewees, either.
Was I missing?

Appreciating your efforts....
YJ

> Best Regards
> Vany
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, erica wrote:
>
> > Here are the selection criteria fyi
> >
> >
> > Proven technical skills and capabilities relevant to the key
deliverables
> > outlined above;
> > Proven project management skills;
> > Proven ability to work effectively in a multicultural environment;
> > Demonstrated high level communication skills (the linga franca of the
> > Internet is English and applicants must have high level English language
> > written and oral communication skills, including technical writing
skills);
> > Ability to work both independently and as a member of a team in an
on-line
> > environment;
> > A demonstrated understanding of issues relating to the technical
> > administration of the domain name system (DNS) and the role played by
the
> > DNSO and ICANN;
> > Cost;
> > Quality of service;
> > Security and redundancy provisions; and
> > Previous experience in providing similar services for international
> > organisations.
> >
> >
> >
> > erica
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
> > To: "erica" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; <council@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: [council] Search Committee report
> >
> >
> > > Erica,
> > >
> > > It would be of help for us to get more info before NC discuss
> > > this topic. Criteria used and evaluation table used for this
selection.
> > >
> > > > Five of the eight respondents (Z,Y,W, V, and T) responded to
> > > > Part A only. Three respondents (S, R, and Q) responded to both
sections
> > > > It was also announced at the Stockholm meeting of DNSO NC (June 3).
> > >
> > > According to the process described in this paper, it should be more
> > > clarified for the record, Erica.
> > >
> > > Even though it said, it was announced on June 3 during NC meting in
> > > Stockholm, which I had no memory on this during NC meeting and
> > > no record even in the meeting minutes.
> > >
> > > The first message to NC regarding this matter was on June 15 with
> > > five days left. I guess that was reason to be delayed for the proposal
> > > deadline.
> > >
> > > >Agreed that expressions of interest for the supply of ISP/Hosting
> > services
> > > >on a sponsored basis should be followed up and that, if appropriate,
> > > >the  ISP/hosting services should  be transitioned to a new supplier
at
> > the
> > > >conclusion of the proposed 12 month contract with Loger Inc.
> > >
> > > Can NC also have access to the details of the contract?
> > >
> > > If my understanding is correct, the recommendation from the Search
> > > committee should get recognized from the NC.
> > >
> > > Appreciating Search committee's works and efforts, I would like to
> > > hear more explanations the difference between Part A's technical
> > > service and Part B's ISP/Web hosting.
> > >
> > > YJ
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
> IT Specialist
> Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
> Tel: (507) 230-4011 ext 213
> Fax: (507) 230-3455
> e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
> http://www.sdnp.org.pa
>