Re: [council] Re: Search Committee report - personal privacy issues

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales <vany@sdnp.org.pa>]

Hi Philip:

YJ is member of a Board of Directors of the bussiness XYZ.   Human Department
Resource of XYZ interviews 7 candidates and elects 1.
YJ, as a member of such a board has all the right to review again the 7 cvs and
see any comment written by the Human Resource Department of XYZ about them
since she is a member of the Board (she is not an outsider, nor another
employee).

Another example:
YJ contributes with money to pay a service that the bussiness XYZ is
searching.  She, because she is paying, has the right to review
all the documentation including comments made by Human Resource Department of
XYZ, since she is contributing with money.

But, Phillip, as I told you...I am agree that such documentation might not be
circulated in a public basis.  Only have to be circulated
amongst the Names Council, by a private e-mail.  In fact, even ICANN staff has
the right to see all documentation, because they will be the ones who will be
the signataries of the final contract.

I hope that this clarify the nature of the request of YJ.

Best Regards
Vany






Philip Sheppard wrote:

> YJ,
> the RFP is of course available, what cannot be made public is the personnel
> related commentary.
>
> Think of it more directly. YJ Park applies for a job for an internet
> company. She does not get the job. A comment on YJ Park's CV, comments of
> how YJ Park interviewed, evaluation on Y J Park's expertise, and why YJ Park
> did not get the job are then made available to the world. Is that right?
>
> Philip

--
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
http://www.sdnp.org.pa