ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] NC agenda item 3 (revised) GAC statement


sorry milton..

i disagree with you here on both issues

ken
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>
To: <philip.sheppard@aim.be>; <kstubbs@digitel.net>; <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [council] NC agenda item 3 (revised) GAC statement


> Ken:
> I don't think it's fair to complain about "discussion at such a 
> late hour" when the basic resolution was circulated over
> a week ago and the final revisions were made in response
> to an ICANN management report released today.
> 
> If the DNSO wants to participate in policy making
> it has to be able to react to such situations. I think
> Philip's response has been as timely and responsible
> as possible under the circumstances.
> 
> I find the language exceedingly diplomatic and gentle.
> If you disagree, look at some of my old
> posts on this topic. ;-)
> 
> --MM
> 
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>