ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] NC agenda item 3 (revised) GAC statement


Ken:
I don't think it's fair to complain about "discussion at such a 
late hour" when the basic resolution was circulated over
a week ago and the final revisions were made in response
to an ICANN management report released today.

If the DNSO wants to participate in policy making
it has to be able to react to such situations. I think
Philip's response has been as timely and responsible
as possible under the circumstances.

I find the language exceedingly diplomatic and gentle.
If you disagree, look at some of my old
posts on this topic. ;-)

--MM




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>