RE: [council] RE: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC

["Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>]

Thanks Paul.  

Ms. Secretariat, can we use a similar a[[approach?

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul M. Kane [mailto:Paul.Kane@REACTO.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Chicoine, Caroline G.
Cc: 'DNSO Secretariat'; council@dnso.org; nc-udrp@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [council] RE: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC


Hello Caroline

The WHOIS Committee decided to use the services of ICANN for soliciting
responses to our questionnaire using various mediums - web, email and hard
copy
basis. We supplied the text to ICANN in all languages, (my offices/staff
provided most of the translation support). We also asked the DNSO
Secretariat to
circulate the details of how to participate and to regularly inform the
community of the on-going survey.

The WHOIS Committee provide their time pro-bono so it was important the
results
were presented in a user friendly manner. The service we received was
excellent
in terms of technical support (if a little slow in providing us with the
results). ICANN were not involved in any other way. The review of the
comments
is currently on-going.....

Hope this helps and I wish you well with the UDRP review.

Best

Paul

"Chicoine, Caroline G." wrote:

> Do you know what they did for the Whois survey?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DNSO Secretariat [mailto:DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 5:35 AM
> To: Chicoine, Caroline G.
> Cc: council@dnso.org; nc-udrp@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC
>
> Secretariat proposal :
>
> May be the best thing to do is not to put anything on the Website, but to
> post the Questionnaire in a txt format to ga@dnso.org and to
> nc-udrp@dnso.org, with an automatic reply to nc-udrp@dnso.org so that
people
> from the Task force can review the results.
> Then the only thing people will have to do is to reply to the mail and to
> fill in the blanks.
> Any comments ?
>
>         dnso.org webmaster.
>
> On 05 Nov, Chicoine, Caroline G. wrote :
> > Please find below the UDRP Review Questionnaire for posting on the ICANN
> and
> > DNSO's websites.  Once it has been posted by the Secretariat, I ask that
> > each Council member provide your Constituency with the link, and that
> Danny
> > provide the GA with a link (I do not have Danny's email handy and I
cannot
> > get out of this email to access it so I will resend with a copy to him).
>
> >
> > As you will note, there are several "Other" areas and areas in which we
> are
> > requesting comments (rather than a "yes" or "no") and so I was unsure as
> to
> > whether I needed to actually leave blanks or not.  Let me know if any
> format
> > changes are required.  Also, how should the Task Force review the
> repsonse.
> > Will they be posted to nc-udrp@dnso.org or will we need to monitor a
> certain
> > list?  Please advise.
> >
> > Please email the list when it is posted so that are translators can then
> > translate it into French and Spanish.  Once translated, could our
> > translators please send the translated version to the Secretariat, for
> > posting, and again I ask that once posted the Council members advise
their
> > Constituencies and Danny the GA.
> >
> > Finally, upon a review of the current draft of the Terms of Reference, I
> > noticed that it needs to be updated.  Specifically, the "November
> 2-December
> > 15" deadline for submitting questionnaire to public should be changed to
> > "November 2-December 17"  given I am two days late in getting it posted.
> > Likewise, please change the "November 1-January 15" deadline to November
> > 1-January 17", and the January 16-February 1" deadline to January
> > 17-February 13".  The February 14 deadline stays the same, but the entry
> > should read "Names Council votes on Report at its February 14th
> > teleconference"
> >
> > If you have any questions, please let me know.
> >
> > Thanks to all of those who participated in developing the questionnaire.
> > Please remember that our work has only just begun.
> >
> >
> >
> >  <<UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC>>