<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Re: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC
How many responses are you expecting to have with this
questionnaire ?
tens? hundreds? thousands?
In case you are expecting something bigger than "tens" I would
say to think in the review process and change the initial format for
specific questions/answers, it is not easy to read thousands of pages of
comments.
Oscar
At 05:34 AM 11/6/2001, DNSO Secretariat wrote:
Secretariat proposal :
May be the best thing to do is not to put anything on the Website, but to
post the Questionnaire in a txt format to ga@dnso.org and to
nc-udrp@dnso.org, with an automatic reply to nc-udrp@dnso.org so that
people from the Task force can review the results.
Then the only thing people will have to do is to reply to the mail and to
fill in the blanks.
Any comments ?
dnso.org
webmaster.
On 05 Nov, Chicoine, Caroline G. wrote :
> Please find below the UDRP Review Questionnaire for posting on the
ICANN and
> DNSO's websites. Once it has been posted by the Secretariat, I
ask that
> each Council member provide your Constituency with the link, and
that Danny
> provide the GA with a link (I do not have Danny's email handy and I
cannot
> get out of this email to access it so I will resend with a copy to
him).
>
> As you will note, there are several "Other" areas and
areas in which we are
> requesting comments (rather than a "yes" or
"no") and so I was unsure as to
> whether I needed to actually leave blanks or not. Let me know
if any format
> changes are required. Also, how should the Task Force review
the repsonse.
> Will they be posted to nc-udrp@dnso.org or will we need to monitor a
certain
> list? Please advise.
>
> Please email the list when it is posted so that are translators can
then
> translate it into French and Spanish. Once translated, could
our
> translators please send the translated version to the Secretariat,
for
> posting, and again I ask that once posted the Council members advise
their
> Constituencies and Danny the GA.
>
> Finally, upon a review of the current draft of the Terms of
Reference, I
> noticed that it needs to be updated. Specifically, the
"November 2-December
> 15" deadline for submitting questionnaire to public should be
changed to
> "November 2-December 17" given I am two days late in
getting it posted.
> Likewise, please change the "November 1-January 15"
deadline to November
> 1-January 17", and the January 16-February 1" deadline to
January
> 17-February 13". The February 14 deadline stays the same,
but the entry
> should read "Names Council votes on Report at its February
14th
> teleconference"
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
>
> Thanks to all of those who participated in developing the
questionnaire.
> Please remember that our work has only just begun.
>
>
>
> <<UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC>>
Top Level Domain .MX
Tel +52 (8)3875346
http://www.nic.mx
El contenido del presente mensaje de datos es confidencial. El Emisor no
es apoderado de NIC-Mexico ni tiene facultad alguna para obligar a
NIC-Mexico con la transmision y contenido del presente mensaje de datos,
incluyendo el (los) archivo(s) anexo(s).
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|