ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] DNSO NC Shanghai meeting agenda, October 29, 2002


Since I will be unable to attend the meeting in
Shanghai, I pass my proxy first to J.Scott and then to
Laurence.
I look forward to hearing more, and to the contact
details.
Have a safe trip to all who attend!
Ellen
--- DNSO Secretariat <DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org>
wrote:
> 
> 
> [ To: council@dnso.org ]
> [ To: ga@dnso.org, announce@dnso.org ]
> [ To: liaison7c@dnso.org ]
> 
> [
>
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20021029.NCShanghai-meeting-agenda.html
> ]
> 
> ICANN/DNSO
> 
>    DNSO Names Council Shanghai, China Meeting on
> October 29 2002 - Agenda
> 
>  
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 14 October 2002.
> 
> Coordinated Universal Time UTC 06:00 - see below for
> local times
> 
> Bruce Tonkin will be chairing the Names Council
> meeting
> 
> Scheduled time for meeting - 180 mins.
> 
> PROPOSED NAMES COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday , October 29,
> 2002
> 
> This agenda was established according to the Rules
> of Procedure for the DNSO
> Names Council
>
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010711.NCprocedures-v4.0.html
> 
>   1. Approval of agenda
> 
>   2. Summary of last meetings
> 
>     
>
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020926.NCteleconf-minutes.html
>     
>
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20021003.NCteleconf-minutes.html
> 
>   3. Issues arising from the teleconference of 3
> October 2002
> 
>      3.1. Ratify email vote on 4 Resolutions - [10
> mins]
>     
>
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20021001.NC-resolutions-vote.html
> 
>      3.2 Vote on change of Names Council Procedures
> for appointing task
>      force chairs [15 mins] Resolution proposed by
> Jordyn Buchanan and
>      seconded by Ellen Shankman
> 
>        1. Whereas, the Names Council Rules of
> Procedure for the DNSO
>           Council, Version 7, currently provides
> that:
>          
>
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020418.NCprocedures-v7.0.html
> 
>           "The chair of an interim committee,
> committee or task force is
>           appointed by the NC. In the case of a task
> force the NC typically
>           chooses to ratify the election of a chair
> by the task force
>           itself. The chair must be an NC member."
> 
>        2. Whereas, the Names Council seeks to
> encourage diversity of
>           participation from each of its
> constituencies as well as the
>           General Assembly on Task Forces;
> 
>        3. Whereas, the Names Council recognizes that
> due to time, resources,
>           and specialized fields of expertise, the
> most appropriate people
>           to serve on such Task Forces may not
> include members who serve on
>           the Names Council;
> 
>        4. Whereas, the Names Council recognizes the
> amount of time and work
>           that must be performed by the Chair of the
> Task Force and that
>           such time and work may not be able to be
> performed by an existing
>           Names Council member;
> 
>        5. Whereas, the Names Council also recognizes
> that it must maintain
>           short lines of communication with any TF
> and also maintain control
>           over policy issues:
> 
>           Therefore, be it resolved that:
> 
>           a) Section 3.2 of the Names Council Rules
> of Procedure for the
>           DNSO Council, Version 7, be amended to
> state: "3.2 (a) Chair: The
>           chair of an interim committee, committee
> or task force is
>           appointed by the NC. In the case of a task
> force the NC typically
>           chooses to ratify the election of a chair
> by the task force
>           itself. The chair need not be an NC
> member;
> 
>           b) A new Section 3.2(b) is inserted to
> state: "3.2(b) Liaison: The
>           NC may appoint one or more liaisons to any
> TF for the purpose of
>           ensuring that the TF is complying with the
> TF Terms of Reference
>           (or issues statement as it may be referred
> to) and to report back
>           to the NC the progress made of the TF.
> 
>   4. Deletes task force [for decision - 30 minutes]
> Policy Process initiated
>      on 3 Oct 2002
>     
>
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020919.NCdeletes-issues.html
> 
>      Terms of reference
>        1. determine whether a uniform delete process
> by gtld registrars
>           following expiry is desirable, and if so,
> recommend an appropriate
>           process
>        2. determine whether a uniform delete process
> by gtld registrars
>           following a failure of a registrant to
> provide accurate WHOIS
>           information upon request is desirable, and
> if so, recommend an
>           appropriate process
>        3. determine whether a uniform delete and
> re-allocation process by
>           gtld registries following receipt of a
> delete command from a
>           registrar is desirable, and if so,
> recommend an appropriate
>           process
>        4. determine whether a uniform process for
> reversing errors in
>           renewal commands without requiring a
> delete operation is
>           desirable, and if so, recommend an
> appropriate process
> 
>      Process
>        1. task force members from each constituency
> due 17 Oct 2002 (10 days
>           after 7 Oct 02)
>        2. open public comments on the topic for 20
> days beginning 14 Oct
>           2002
>        3. constituency position statements due 8 Nov
> 2002 (35 days after 3
>           Oct 02)
>        4. Preliminary Task Force Report due 15 Nov
> 2002 - Task Force Report
>           due 25 Nov 2002
>        5. Public comment period from 25 Nov 2002
> until 16 Dec 2002 (20 days)
>        6. Final Task Force Report due 26 Dec 2002 -
> Council to review report
>           at meeting around 5 Jan 2003
>        7. Board Report due around 10 Jan 2003
> 
>      Current Task Force Membership
>         o Jordyn Buchanan (Registry constituency
> rep, and initial chair)
>         o Adam Peake (Non-commercial org
> constituency rep)
>         o Bret Fausett (Business constituency rep)
>         o as of 14 Oct still waiting for ccTLDs,
> Intellectual Property,
>           Registrars, ISPs to nominate)
>         o up to 3 additional reps (recommend one
> from the individual
>           registrant /GA community)
> 
>      Resolution for the Names Council to approve the
> terms of reference and
>      initial membership.
> 
>   5. Transfers Task Force [for discussion - 30 mins]
>      - review task force report and recommendations
> 
>   6. WHOIS Task Force [for discussion - 30 mins]
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>