Re: [council] Request for ICANN Board members from the GNSO to Participate

[Thomas Keller <tom@schlund.de>]

I would like to second this suggestion.

tom

Am 06.06.2003 schrieb Milton Mueller:
> Seems like a couple of good suggestions for me. Why don't we 
> "discuss" it online and if there is general agreement implement these
> proposals at the next Council meeting? 
> 
> >>> "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> 06/06/03 04:23AM >>>
> 
> My suggestion is that we:
> (1) invite the GNSO elected Board members to listen-in on GNSO Council
> meetings, but not participate in procedural or policy development
> discussions (ie they will not have the same rights as the GAC or ALAC
> liaisons)
> [NOTE the invitation would be a courtesy as Board members can listen to
> GNSO Council meetings anyway]
> 
> (2) schedule an item on the agenda for GNSO Council meetings for a
> dialogue with the GNSO elected Board members, where the Board members
> may request clarification of GNSO Council discussions, and the GNSO
> Council members may request clarification/updates of Board activities.
> 
> This way we keep a clear separation between the role of a Board member
> and the role of a Council member, but ensure that the Board members may
> listen to the debate surrounding issues, and also seek clarification on
> GNSO decisions.
> 
> I am not sure that we need to pass a formal motion, as (1) is already
> available, and (2) is an issue of agenda scheduling.
> 
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w