[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga-full] Re: [ga] Re: {Special notice to Harald Alvestrand} for: Re:[ga-abuse] Re: Id...
- To: Harald@Alvestrand.no, DillonM0081@aol.com, jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com, baptista@pccf.net
- Subject: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Re: {Special notice to Harald Alvestrand} for: Re:[ga-abuse] Re: Id...
- From: Dnsipv6@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:25:21 EST
- CC: ga@dnso.org, wdaley@doc.gov, bburr@ntia.doc.gov, Eric.Menge@sba.gov, edyson@edventure.com, james.tierney@usdoj.gov, phil_gramm@gramm.senate.gov, ga-listadmin@dnso.org, vcerf@mci.net
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
Harald,
Do you still wish for me to call you as well Harald? If so let me
know what the best time is tomorrow and I shall. I talked to
Dillon on the phone about 10mins ago and he informed me you
two chatted. So I am informed. I will listen to the recording later
this evening of your two's conversation.
David "Dude" Jenson
In a message dated 2/14/00 4:39:58 PM Pacific Standard Time,
Harald@Alvestrand.no writes:
<< At 14:49 14.02.00 -0500, DillonM0081@aol.com wrote:
>Harald,
>
>But I am curious
>enough to be willing to 'Chat' with you. So if you have a phone
>Number please send it to me if you would.
You can call me at +47 92 84 49 07.
What was your number again?
>BTW two things. You never answered my questions and you
>never provided James or Bob and address or phone/fax number
>by which any documentation that could be sent anyway.
I don't have a personal fax number (I use my company's faxes), so I thought
I'd check which of them to use before sending it to them.
They seem to have decided not to send anything, so that's not a problem.
For phone - see above.
For physical mail - use this one:
Harald Alvestrand
EDB Maxware
Pirsenteret
N-7064 Trondheim
NORWAY
(That address was also published in RFC 2434 in October 1998, so it's not
exactly a secret. I'm easy to find.)
> Why
>not? I know they ask for a secure one. I think that is a smart
>or very wise requirement for sending personal or confidential
>information. I always require the same if it is someone I am not
>familiar with that is requesting such information.
The concept of "secure" fax is interesting, but not terribly useful; there
are no open standards for "secure" faxes.
> And with me
>anyway regular or registered mail for this sort of information
>in this type of deal, would be completely out of the question.
Any particular reason for that?
>If you find that strange, and some do, well that is your privilege
>and I don't give a dam! This is one of the strong points of
>INEGROUP I think.
OK - I note that you're placing yourself into the category of people
unwilling to provide any indication of their existence.
> Well anyway at this point, I will close here and say, I await
>you phone Number for our 'Chat' >-:)
Awaiting your call with curiosity.
Note that it's 11 PM over here, so it's not likely you'll get to call
before I go to bed. And I don't sleep near this phone.
Have fun!
Harald
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no >>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html