[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga-full] Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN Board to Nominate "At-large" Directors!!!
- To: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@dnso.org>
- Subject: [ga-full] Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN Board to Nominate "At-large" Directors!!!
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 13:22:00 -0800
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <l03130303b4f171bd091d@[204.188.254.53]>
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
Ellen and all,
I agree that the ICANN @Large seems to be a very weak process.
This is of course indicative of the ICANN board. It has been very weak
on process, thus producing very poor substance in many instances. The
UDRP and the "Accreditation Policy" is just two past examples.
Nominees should come from the membership itself. But as we [INEGroup]
predicted almost a year ago now, the ICANN board does not wish or want
this to occur for reasons of loosing a tight fisted control of things.
Ellen Rony wrote:
> I currently serve as chair the Nominating Committee for the Environmental
> Forum of Marin, a 27 year-old organization. In our situation, the
> Nominating Committee wields enormous power because it screens potential
> candidates and presents a proposed slate to the Board of Directors which is
> then approved to be voted on by the members at the annual meeting. While
> additional nominees can come from the floor at that time, the vote is
> always pro forma. The Nominating Committee nominates its successors.
>
> Where are the checks and balances in the ICANN @Large nominating plan? An
> ICANN board can appoint a Nominating Committee that has a particular agenda
> or perspective and may screen out candidates who do not fit the desired
> mold.
>
> >icann-announce@icann.org wrote:
> >
> >The following are highlights from the ICANN Board's 10 March 2000
> >meeting in Cairo:
> >
> >At-Large Membership:
> >
> > The Board instructed the staff to prepare Bylaws amendments
> > and other resolutions, for public comment and subsequent
> > Board action, to accomplish the following:
> >
> > * Establish a Nominating Committee to be appointed by the
> > Board to accept recommendations from the Internet community
> > for At-Large ICANN Directors, and to nominate five or more
> > candidates for consideration for selection to the ICANN
> > Board.
>
> -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
> Ellen Rony // http://www.domainhandbook.com
> Co-author *=" ____ / erony@marin.k12.ca.us
> The Domain Name Handbook \ ) +1 415.435.5010
> // \\ "Carpe canine"
>
> The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html