[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ga-full] IP address holders - are they represented?

To: aso-policy@lists.aso.icann.org
Subject: [ga-full] IP address holders - are they represented?
From: "!Dr. Joe Baptista" <baptista@pccf.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 04:38:59 -0500 (EST)
cc: aso-comment@lists.aso.icann.org, DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET, list@ifwp.org, ga@dnso.org
Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org


I am increasingly concerned that the ASO has no means of representing
indivudual ipv4 holders.  The virtual infrastructure is represented, but
those people who operate the ipv4 structure (ipv4 holders) have no
representation whatsoever in the "bottoms up" ICANN process.

Am i wrong in making this conclusion?

Regards
Joe Baptista

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Follow-Ups:
- [ga-full] Re: [IFWP] IP address holders - are they represented?
  - From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: [ga-full] Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN Board to Nominate "At-large" Directors!!!
Next by Date: [ga-full] RE: [aso-comment] IP address holders - are they represented?
Prev by thread: [ga-full] Re: [IFWP] Re: ICANN Board to Nominate "At-large" Directors!!!
Next by thread: [ga-full] Re: [IFWP] IP address holders - are they represented?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread