ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] new constituencies


There is no constituency representing the consumer/end user.  They are a
group that are vital to the continued viability of the net.

Peter Veeck

Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Joop,
>
> >Since the process is now still open, we might as well help the special
> NC
> >task force in their thinking:
> >
> >
> >**********************************
> >.......
> >*******
> >My first reaction: the DNSO was supposed to be a representative
> structure of
> >all stakeholders in the DNS. Balancing  "ëffectiveness" for some
> special
> >interests against "representativeness" of the body itself is not a
> proper
> >exercise.
> >"Effective" has different meanings for different interests.
> >
>
> The comments I delivered on Monday addressed somehow your concern, as I
> raised specifically the question on whether other groups could be
> identified that were not adequately represented in the existing
> constituencies.
>
> Any other comments to the draft, that you want me to report?
>
> Regards
> Roberto
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>