Re: [ga] new constituencies

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto.gaetano@voila.fr>]

Peter,

In my opinion, the consumer/end users are better represented in the 
AtLarge, but I will raise nevertheless the subject in the DNSO Review 
task force.

FYI, there is the concrete possibility to build a more permanent forum 
for AtLarge members, that will remain also after the elections.
This is a primary need (see my comments in Yokohama on the subject), and
 we have to work on it.

Regards
Roberto



>There is no constituency representing the consumer/end user.  They are 
a
>group that are vital to the continued viability of the net.
>
>Peter Veeck
>
>Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>
>> Joop,
>>
>> >Since the process is now still open, we might as well help the 
special
>> NC
>> >task force in their thinking:
>> >
>> >
>> >**********************************
>> >.......
>> >*******
>> >My first reaction: the DNSO was supposed to be a representative
>> structure of
>> >all stakeholders in the DNS. Balancing  "ëffectiveness" for some
>> special
>> >interests against "representativeness" of the body itself is not a
>> proper
>> >exercise.
>> >"Effective" has different meanings for different interests.
>> >
>>
>> The comments I delivered on Monday addressed somehow your concern, as
 I
>> raised specifically the question on whether other groups could be
>> identified that were not adequately represented in the existing
>> constituencies.
>>
>> Any other comments to the draft, that you want me to report?
>>
>> Regards
>> Roberto
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html