Re: [ga] new constituencies

[Peter Veeck <veeck@texoma.net>]

I would tend to agree with you if, the AtLarge membership had a mail list or
if they were restricted from membership in other constituencies as are the
existing constituencies.  There is no way to get or form a consensus as
there is no way to know the membership of the At Large.  The AtLarge
membership list is denied even to candidates for ICANN board from the
AtLarge group.

Peter Veeck

Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> Peter,
>
> In my opinion, the consumer/end users are better represented in the
> AtLarge, but I will raise nevertheless the subject in the DNSO Review
> task force.
>
> FYI, there is the concrete possibility to build a more permanent forum
> for AtLarge members, that will remain also after the elections.
> This is a primary need (see my comments in Yokohama on the subject), and
>  we have to work on it.
>
> Regards
> Roberto
>
> >There is no constituency representing the consumer/end user.  They are
> a
> >group that are vital to the continued viability of the net.
> >
> >Peter Veeck
> >
> >Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >
> >> Joop,
> >>
> >> >Since the process is now still open, we might as well help the
> special
> >> NC
> >> >task force in their thinking:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >**********************************
> >> >.......
> >> >*******
> >> >My first reaction: the DNSO was supposed to be a representative
> >> structure of
> >> >all stakeholders in the DNS. Balancing  "ëffectiveness" for some
> >> special
> >> >interests against "representativeness" of the body itself is not a
> >> proper
> >> >exercise.
> >> >"Effective" has different meanings for different interests.
> >> >
> >>
> >> The comments I delivered on Monday addressed somehow your concern, as
>  I
> >> raised specifically the question on whether other groups could be
> >> identified that were not adequately represented in the existing
> >> constituencies.
> >>
> >> Any other comments to the draft, that you want me to report?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Roberto
> >> --
> >> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
> >
> >

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html