<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[2]: [ga] List rules
William,
>
>I agree. I support the GA Chair being in control for now....but that
>may be because I trust Roberto and you. Had the NC appointed someone
>of less trustworthiness, I may have felt differently.
>
Thanks.
>I think the GA should have some control over its Chair. Some means
>to get rid of a chair, etc. There should be some recourse from the GA
>that the chair is subject to that will keep the GA chair on the side
>of the GA. As it stands now the GA Chair exists at the whim of the
>NC, and has to be pleasing to them.
>
You are absolutely right.
And in fact, I wonder whether this matter should be raised now, in the
scope of the to-be-formed WG for the DNSO Review.
It will be perfectly legitimate, IMHO, to ask for a modification of the
rules in the sense of a direct election of the GA Chairman by the GA.
Regards
Roberto
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|