Re: [ga] List rules

[Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>]

At 12:27 PM 8/24/00 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>At 00:22 24/08/2000 -0700, Simon Higgs wrote:
>>NC creates a problem. GA Chair is more suitable, but it really should be 
>>the operational list keeper.
>
>that's what we got into trouble about with "no democratic oversight" back 
>in the fall of '99.
>The operational list keeper is (and wants to be) a strictly technical 
>role; the troubles the list rules were designed to deal with are not of a 
>strictly technical nature.

It's a trust issue. If the trust to exercise that task exists, then 
democratic oversight is not needed. If it does not exist, you are already 
compromised. Democratic oversight deals only with the symptoms created by 
that lack of trust. It doesn't deal with the root cause.

It's not a perfect world so you've got to do what you've got to do.


Best Regards,

Simon Higgs

--
It's a feature not a bug...

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html