Re: [ga] bodacious-tata[s].NET

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Marc,
it seems that you went faster than me as I registered this after-noon
bodacious-tata.net and bodacious-tatas.net to see if there is a difference
between one breast (the Tata TM as no 's') and two breasts.

My idea was to propose to name a WIPO big flop a "bodacious tata".
And to open a "bodacious-tata" contest for WIPO panelists, with a
yearly award. This to protect people against panelists misbehavior. As
there is no appeal: it could provide some kind of a community control
and a de facto increased protection. The site would certainly want to
be a positive part of the UDRP system. I would then be interested in
an UDRP against it. My intent was to call on all the UDRP pros to
nominate panelists as they are shocked by a decision.
May be could we join forces?
Jefsey

At 02:32 03/09/00, you wrote:
>A recent UDRP case, which is both sad and funny, made me set up a website
>under a domain very similar to that deleted by WIPO.
>
>If you are interested in WIPO versus free speech issues, I kindly invite
>you to have a look at
>
>http://www.bodacious-tatas.ORG
>
>Please, note the ORG. The disputed domain was .COM.
>
>Any further info, refs to articles, comments in the press or elswhere
>would be much appreciated!
>
>Thanks for your time!
>--
>Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl
>  marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org
>
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html