<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [icann-candidates] Re: [ga] bodacious-tata[s].NET
Jefsey,
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> Marc,
> it seems that you went faster than me
I can be fast, yes, let us keep that possibility open for new domains :-))
> as I registered this after-noon
> bodacious-tata.net and bodacious-tatas.net to see if there is a difference
> between one breast (the Tata TM as no 's') and two breasts.
I nearly registered the .net myself, but thought .org was more in tune
with the original purpose of the TLDs. Even if this has been given up
officialy.
> My idea was to propose to name a WIPO big flop a "bodacious tata".
> And to open a "bodacious-tata" contest for WIPO panelists, with a
> yearly award.
You could make this a weekly award. Plenty candidates.
> This to protect people against panelists misbehavior. As
> there is no appeal: it could provide some kind of a community control
> and a de facto increased protection. The site would certainly want to
> be a positive part of the UDRP system. I would then be interested in
> an UDRP against it. My intent was to call on all the UDRP pros to
> nominate panelists as they are shocked by a decision.
My main concern is that this case sets a precedent. The TM lobby cleverly
moves ahead with a case against a porn domain for which nobody has much
sympathy, or rather does not want to show sympathy. Next time someone from
wherever who calls his company Fun may claim all domains with fun in it.
I doubt the owner of bodacious-tatas.com will fight this case in court. It
is probably not worth the money it costs. So we must fight it in the
press. Setting up a little site is a good (and inexpensive) way to get
attention. I hope...
> May be could we join forces?
By all means!
Marc
--
Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl
marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org
> At 02:32 03/09/00, you wrote:
> >A recent UDRP case, which is both sad and funny, made me set up a website
> >under a domain very similar to that deleted by WIPO.
> >
> >If you are interested in WIPO versus free speech issues, I kindly invite
> >you to have a look at
> >
> >http://www.bodacious-tatas.ORG
> >
> >Please, note the ORG. The disputed domain was .COM.
> >
> >Any further info, refs to articles, comments in the press or elswhere
> >would be much appreciated!
> >
> >Thanks for your time!
> >--
> >Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl
> > marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> icann-candidates-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
--
Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl
marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|