Re: [ga] Fuzz about Froomkin

[Sandy Harris <sandy@storm.ca>]

Andy Gardner wrote:
> 
> At 5:36 pm -0500 10/31/00, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> >I'm prepared to second Harald's motion in this form, if he makes it.
> 
> Not if I beat you to it. :^)
> 
> >
> >On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> >
> >> the more interesting point is what we should propose to replace them.
> >> I think a motion that calls for Frank Fitzsimmons, Hans Kraaijenbrink, Jun
> >> Murai, and Linda Wilson to resign from the board and leave the chairs empty
> >> until the rest of the board has decided upon a procedure to fill the 4
> >> seats would be more complete than a proposal to just have them resign.
> >>
> >> The spectre of four empty seats was the excuse for leaving them on in the
> >> first place. That this is worrying is something I don't understand.
> >>
> >
> >Me neither.
> 
> Becuase with 4 seats empty, the elected board members - the only ones that
> deserve to be there - have a higher percentage of the vote.
> >
> >> Oh well - I might understand more after Los Angeles.
> >>
> >
> >Well, if you mean you'll see the old guard hanging on to control as long
> >as possible to deny the elected directors input into the gTLD decisions,
> >then maybe...
> 
> Since the elected board members don't get ushered in until after the AGM
> (when the big decisions have already been rubber stamped), can we have the
> squatters booted BEFORE the AGM, then have 4 of the 5 elected members
> replace them until after the AGM, when they take their own seats?
> 
Better to have the squatters leave and put in all five elected members
before the AGM. I see no reasonable way to decide which four would replace
them.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html