<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors
Marc,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Marc
> Schneiders
> Sent: 7. november 2000 10:33
> To: Alf Hansen
> Cc: Sandy Harris; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, at 09:22 [=GMT+0100], Alf Hansen wrote:
>
> > I think it is a waste of time for the DNSO GA to decide
> anything about the
> > composition of the Board. The DNSO should give advice to the Board about
> > DNSO matters. Of course, we can have an opinion about it, but I
> think other
> > channels than the DNSO have to be used if the goal is to change the
> > composition of the Board.
>
> Perhaps you have other channels. I have not.
> Perhaps you can use those other channels? For those of us, who are not
> 'inside', making a statement is about the only thing. And I wouldn't
> mind getting it out in the open.
> I am sure ICANN is also much in favour of that, given its bottom-up
> approach and transparency.
>
I have no such channels, either. I just think we should focus on things we
can do something about and act as a Domain Name Support Organisation, not as
the Owner of the ICANN company. We can play that we are the owners, but it
will be a waste of time. Let us make some progress on the issues on item 3
on the Agenda for LA:
- Individual Constituency, 10 min
- Procedures for GA Chair elections, 10 min
- Relationship GA/@Large, 5 min
- Multilingual testbed, 5 min
- New TLDs, 5 min
- DNSO Review, 40 min
As you see, there are very few minutes per item, so we need to cover them on
line on beforehand.
Just my opinion.
Best regards,
Alf H
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|