RE: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors

[Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org>]

On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, at 13:47 [=GMT+0100], Alf Hansen wrote:
[In between I wrote:]
> > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, at 09:22 [=GMT+0100], Alf Hansen wrote:
> >
> > > I think it is a waste of time for the DNSO GA to decide
> > anything about the
> > > composition of the Board. The DNSO should give advice to the Board about
> > > DNSO matters. Of course, we can have an opinion about it, but I
> > think other
> > > channels than the DNSO have to be used if the goal is to change the
> > > composition of the Board.
> >
> > Perhaps you have other channels. I have not.
> > Perhaps you can use those other channels? For those of us, who are not
> > 'inside', making a statement is about the only thing. And I wouldn't
> > mind getting it out in the open.
> > I am sure ICANN is also much in favour of that, given its bottom-up
> > approach and transparency.
> >
> I have no such channels, either. I just think we should focus on things we
> can do something about and act as a Domain Name Support Organisation, not as
> the Owner of the ICANN company. We can play that we are the owners, but it
> will be a waste of time. 

I do not see it as you seem to do. Calling on people to do the right
thing, does not imply any claim.

> Let us make some progress on the issues on item 3
> on the Agenda for LA:
[...]
> As you see, there are very few minutes per item, so we need to cover them on
> line on beforehand.

I would not construe this as an "or". The motion presented and
seconded will not take much time, will it?

And the list is not that busy anyway.

I call upon the chair to have this motion voted on. Again: bottom-up,
transparency...

-- 
Marc Schneiders (rest in header)


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html