Re: [ga] Extension of the Interim Board Directors

["'Kent Crispin'" <kent@songbird.com>]

On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 03:19:45PM -0800, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> 
> > Steps to an individual's constituency:
> > 
> > 1) get the NC's "intake committee" working.
> > 2) use the intake committee to start a working group on the subject 
> > of an individual's constituency.
> > 3) hash out the details
> > 4) come up with a recommendation to the NC
> > 5) have the NC pass it to the board.
> > 
> > An individual's constituency can't be formed without the agreement of 
> > the current constituencies and the concurrence of the NC.  This is 
> > obvious.  Therefore, we should just use the processes in 
> > place.  By far 
> > the most important missing component at this point is the "intake 
> > committee" -- there is no way to get something on the NC's agenda.  
> 
> 
> Ahhhha! Now the light shines clear!
> 
> None of the other constituencies had to go through with this. Why, what is
> arguably the single most important constituency, have to go through this?

Stop whining.  You do what you have to do.

> The reason is that the ICANN BoD doesn't want it to exist!

Nope.  If the DNSO as a whole comes up with a plan for an individual's 
constituency, the BOD won't stand in the way.

> That is why they
> didn't instantiate it in Berlin.

They didn't instantiate it because 1) there is a lot of opposition to it 
in the DNSO; and because 2) there was no creditable effort in place.  
Joops hobby does not count as a creditable effort

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html