[ga] the IDNO [was: Extension of the Interim Board Directors]

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 16:04 7/11/00 -0800, 'Kent Crispin' wrote:

>
>Stop whining.  You do what you have to do.
>

Only the Board could say this and be listened to.
But the Board didn't say anything. 
Does it now speak through you?

>> The reason is that the ICANN BoD doesn't want it to exist!
>
>Nope.  If the DNSO as a whole comes up with a plan for an individual's 
>constituency, the BOD won't stand in the way.
>
That is not what the Bylaws say. There is no role for the DNSO to "stand in
the way" or "clear the way".
The DNSO GA's role is to make it's collective consensus known to the Board.
It already did this in Yokohama. 

>> That is why they
>> didn't instantiate it in Berlin.
>
>They didn't instantiate it because 1) there is a lot of opposition to it 
>in the DNSO; and because 2) there was no creditable effort in place.  
>Joops hobby does not count as a creditable effort
>
Nobody pays me to do this, that's true. Does that make an Individual DN
holders' constituency unworthy of recognition? Or more worthy?
It is an effort of many people. All unpaid. 

GA members  might want to look at the members' list and see who have joined
lately. www.idno.org/members.htm


--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association and 
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
Elected representative.
http://www.idno.org  

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html