ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to c hange seating rule)


Are you saying that the GA had any voice in any NC member?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 3:48 PM
> To: 'Roeland Meyer'; 'Kent Crispin'; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General 
> Assembly call to
> c hange seating rule)
> 
> 
> Roeland,
> 
> As Kent already pointed out, NC members are elected by the 
> constituencies.
> They are definitely not appointed by the board.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roeland Meyer [mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 12:53 PM
> To: 'Kent Crispin'; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General 
> Assembly call to
> c hange seating rule)
> 
> 
> 1) We don't elect NC members, that much is obvious. We tried 
> and we failed.
> The ICANN BoD appointed whomever they want, regardless of the 
> wishes of the
> GA. That record is clear.
> 
> 2) There is no impeachement mechanism that works. If there 
> is, show it to
> me.
> 
> 3) The NC is an appointed body, not an elected one. The ICANN 
> BoD is the
> sole appointer. GA NC elections are meaningless.
> 
> Kent, you knew all of the above when you posted. You lie. 
> However, this is
> the most egregious lie that I have ever seen you make. You 
> are usually not
> this obvious. Are you feeling well? Or, perhaps you are 
> feeling too well.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 9:20 AM
> > To: ga@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General 
> > Assembly call to
> > change seating rule)
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:51:13PM +0800, YJ Park wrote:
> > > 
> > > Who is going to paly a check and balance role for NC?
> > 
> > The checks and balances on the NC are the standard checks and 
> > balances on 
> > *any* elected body -- if you don't like what your 
> representatives do, 
> > you don't re-elect them, or, in the worst case, you impeach them.  
> > That's perfectly normal; there isn't any particular mystery 
> about the 
> > NC in this regard.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
> > kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>