Re: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General Assembly call to c hange seating rule)

[Bob Davis <bob.davis@netzero.net>]

Mr. Meyer and everyone,

  No I don't believe he is.  Mr. Gomes, I believe this question is
directed at you.  Could you please publicly answer this question?

Roeland Meyer wrote:

> Are you saying that the GA had any voice in any NC member?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 3:48 PM
> > To: 'Roeland Meyer'; 'Kent Crispin'; ga@dnso.org
> > Subject: RE: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General
> > Assembly call to
> > c hange seating rule)
> >
> >
> > Roeland,
> >
> > As Kent already pointed out, NC members are elected by the
> > constituencies.
> > They are definitely not appointed by the board.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roeland Meyer [mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 12:53 PM
> > To: 'Kent Crispin'; ga@dnso.org
> > Subject: RE: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General
> > Assembly call to
> > c hange seating rule)
> >
> >
> > 1) We don't elect NC members, that much is obvious. We tried
> > and we failed.
> > The ICANN BoD appointed whomever they want, regardless of the
> > wishes of the
> > GA. That record is clear.
> >
> > 2) There is no impeachement mechanism that works. If there
> > is, show it to
> > me.
> >
> > 3) The NC is an appointed body, not an elected one. The ICANN
> > BoD is the
> > sole appointer. GA NC elections are meaningless.
> >
> > Kent, you knew all of the above when you posted. You lie.
> > However, this is
> > the most egregious lie that I have ever seen you make. You
> > are usually not
> > this obvious. Are you feeling well? Or, perhaps you are
> > feeling too well.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
> > > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 9:20 AM
> > > To: ga@dnso.org
> > > Subject: Re: Consensus vs Voting (RE: [ga] DNSO General
> > > Assembly call to
> > > change seating rule)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 10:51:13PM +0800, YJ Park wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Who is going to paly a check and balance role for NC?
> > >
> > > The checks and balances on the NC are the standard checks and
> > > balances on
> > > *any* elected body -- if you don't like what your
> > representatives do,
> > > you don't re-elect them, or, in the worst case, you impeach them.
> > > That's perfectly normal; there isn't any particular mystery
> > about the
> > > NC in this regard.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
> > > kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Bob Davis


_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
   http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html