ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Reform in the GA?


Hello.

I am writing as a member of this GA, and as a member of an
organization whose leader is now claiming that one thing that
organization has accomplished is a "turning of the GA of the DNSO
around."

I find it odd that anyone who is a member of this assembly can think
that this assembly has been turned around in a positive fashion, when
in fact this GA assembly has not been able to accomplish anything as a
cohesive body.  It can't even initiate elections to replace a GA Chair
whose office long ago expired.  It has been unable to even agree on a
set of principles to put forward for giving itself a real role in the
organization.

So I'd like to know what the other GA members think.

Has there been a "turning of the GA" around?

I have to say that the credibility of the person who made this claim
took a nose dive when he claimed that the IDNO was responsible for
this so called "turning" around that doesn't appear to have ever
occurred.
  

-- 
Best regards,
 William                          mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>