RE: [ga] New contracts

["Roberto Gaetano" <ga_chair@hotmail.com>]

Joanna Lane wrote:
>
>Added to that, it might be worth the GA self-organizing a small WG of all
>members posting on this topic within the past 7 days, ensuring diversity by
>involving at least one member from each constituency, together with
>interested persons from the GA list. It should be possible for the NC to
>endorse such a proposal well within stated deadlines.


Independently from the possibility to organize formal structures, which may 
eat up time, I would recommend that GA members provide comments to ICANN.
The NC will, IMHO, try to discuss this issue on its teleconference on 
2000-04-10 at the latest, and NC reps should have community input in the 
next week or so.

I am afraid that it is not in our interest to lose time.

Of course w can propose at the same time a WG (that should be focusred on 
*policy*, not this individual contract, i.e. on the answer to the question: 
"is it still worth to have separation btw Registry and Registrar for a large 
gTLD?"
But in the meantime, please comment individually on the matter.

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html