Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Vint and all remaining assembly members,

  If what you say is true, Vint.  Than why is it that it is within the
policy guidance of the BoD?   Shouldn't these sorts of decisions
be in part at least, determined by the stakeholders/participants?

  Shouldn't contract changes that have an huge or even a partial
policy implication also require the approval of the Stakeholders?

  Does the MoU and the White Paper mean anything the the ICANN
BoD at this point?  Has it ever?  Will it ever?  When might that be?

vint cerf wrote:

> DNSO was indeed consulted as to the policy for the creation of new
> TLDs and gave advice which the board accepted to select a modest number
> of TLDs to start this process. The actual selection of a particular TLD
> or party to operate its registry is not a policy matter, it is something
> that ICANN does - within the policy guidance of the board.
>
>  At 05:13 AM 3/11/2001 +0100, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> >Ultimately the point was that the DNSO was not consulted about the
> >selection of new TLDs.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html