ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Board descisions


(Apologies for the late reply. This message from Saturday was
delivered to me today...)

Sorry, I have to disagree. What particular TLDs are added in this
crucial initial expansion of the DNS is a policy matter. Also e.g. the
choice for TLDs that have a different number of characters, which will
certainly confuse users.

On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, at 23:40 [=GMT-0500], vint cerf wrote:

> DNSO was indeed consulted as to the policy for the creation of new
> TLDs and gave advice which the board accepted to select a modest number
> of TLDs to start this process. The actual selection of a particular TLD
> or party to operate its registry is not a policy matter, it is something
> that ICANN does - within the policy guidance of the board.
> 
>  At 05:13 AM 3/11/2001 +0100, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> >Ultimately the point was that the DNSO was not consulted about the
> >selection of new TLDs.
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>