RE: [ga] competition ?

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Chuck,
I was responding to Peter de Blanc,

On 22:06 18/03/01, Gomes, Chuck said:
>The GAC is an advisory group, not an approval authority.
>Chuck Gomes

Peter knows as we all knows that GAC is an advisory group
by "organizations" which do not know about adviszing but
about governing. This is being learned for several months
since Mike Roberts initiated the concept of the letter to the
Govs members of the GAC about the ccTLDs Managers.

What Peter perfectly understood is this:

"why ccTLDs managers who may manage from 10 to 100.000
DNs would be subject to Govs approval and not a gTLD which
manages 15.000.000 of them, i.e. more than any ccTLD in its
own country."

But you are right I should have spelled it out. This is now done.
I will add that we recently had a Gov. response to the VeriSign
policy out of GAC Members control with China.

Jefsey



>  -----Original Message-----
>From:   Jefsey Morfin [mailto:jefsey@wanadoo.fr]
>Sent:   Sunday, March 18, 2001 7:43 AM
>To:     ga@dnso.org
>Subject:        Re: [ga] competition ?
>
>Dear Peter,
>If you consider what *you* could do in the best VeriSign interest
>should you be in Stratton Scalvos seat, I think that Plan B is
>a correct way for VeriSign to better make sure that their market
>share does increase a lot and DN price stabilizes around $20.
>
>On 11:01 18/03/01, Peter de Blanc said:
> >Presumably, VeriSign will have little to do with this area, except possibly
> >as one of many registrars in the game.
> >
> >Does anyone think their (VeriSign's) market share will decrease with new
> >gTLDs in the marketplace?
> >peter de Blanc
>
>I am sure you can come with more action plans in Plan B to that
>end than in Plan A. But that in any case the size effect of VeriSign
>and their common (with the Staff) direspect for the bylaws (VeriSign
>is a Member of the gTLD Constituency) may lead to think that Plan
>B is just helping them more than plan A to become faster, to the
>Intenet, what ATT is to telephone, IBM to computers and MicroSoft
>to microcomputers. This is why I say this should fall under anti-Trust
>scrutiny and GAC approval.
>
>Jefsey
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html