ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Re: Board descisions


Dear Chuck,
thank you for this confirmation.
Obviously dates would be of real interest to put the different events
into perspective.

On 00:13 19/03/01, Gomes, Chuck said:
>My understanding is as follows and as I recall Joe Sims confirmed much of
>this in Melbourne:  VeriSign approached ICANN about the possibility of
>renegotiating the agreements and proposed the $200M investment idea.  At
>first, this seemed to be an unrealistic idea so VeriSign continued pursuing
>the separation of its Registrar business.  Later, some interest was
>communicated by ICANN and they then proposed the terms of the new
>agreements.  Detailed negotiations of those terms then ensued.

Kent spoke of an endowment into the iCANN: could you comment in this?

>I do not know specific time frames of the above, but I can tell you that
>within VeriSign there was not much optimism about the possibility of
>renegotiating until very late in the game, well into 2001.

So why the take-it or leav-it ultimatum.
Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>