Re: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 12:03 pm -0800 3/25/01, William X. Walsh wrote:
>This should be changed to:
>
>"the GA is opposed to any action that results in a change of
>current registration policy for the .org TLD.  Any action of this type
>would eb contrary to the legitimate interests of bona-fide owners of
>.org names."
>
>There may be a couple who disagree with that, but the overwhelming
>numbers suggest this is the way the GA feels.

One would hope that any policy change regarding .org owners would only be
allowed once all those .org owners were polled to find out if they agreed
with such a change.

<sarcasm>ICANN being a bottom-up process, and all that.</sarcasm>

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html