ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract


On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, at 14:12 [=GMT-0600], Andy Gardner wrote:

> At 12:03 pm -0800 3/25/01, William X. Walsh wrote:
> >This should be changed to:
> >
> >"the GA is opposed to any action that results in a change of
> >current registration policy for the .org TLD.  Any action of this type
> >would eb contrary to the legitimate interests of bona-fide owners of
> >.org names."
> >
> >There may be a couple who disagree with that, but the overwhelming
> >numbers suggest this is the way the GA feels.
> 
> One would hope that any policy change regarding .org owners would only be
> allowed once all those .org owners were polled to find out if they agreed
> with such a change.

They can still say they do *not* at:

 http://www.ORG-domain-name-owners-lobby-against-ICANNs-sellout-to-VeriSign.ORG

(or http://disgrace.org/)

> <sarcasm>ICANN being a bottom-up process, and all that.</sarcasm>

The above URL is bottom-up, and from the stakeholders :-)

-- 
marc@pan.bijt.net

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>