RE: Re[2]: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Ah, you're right, I should have been clearer about the forum language.
Well, maybe then, there is that flexibility  if enough concur.  But, can you
live with his original language, though? 
-----Original Message-----
From: William X. Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 6:31 PM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Cc: Roberto Gaetano; philip.sheppard@europe.com; council@dnso.org;
ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract


Hello Marilyn,

Sunday, March 25, 2001, 2:52:43 PM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:


> I thought that Roberto's original formulation was correct, based on the
> polling language. 

Based on what polling language?

The only thing we have to go on is what is said on this forum, and I
didn't see anyone say what was said in that document.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html