ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[4]: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract


Hello Marilyn,

Sunday, March 25, 2001, 3:30:51 PM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:


> Ah, you're right, I should have been clearer about the forum language.
> Well, maybe then, there is that flexibility  if enough concur.  But, can you
> live with his original language, though? 

I don't see it as representative of the consensus of the GA.

It implies that the GA thinks a change in the policy for .org IS
something that should be considered provided that existing registrants
aren't required to give up their names.

I haven't seen any such consensus here on that, nor do I think that
statement is appropriate or reflective of the sense of the GA.

-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>