<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[4]: [ga] GA position on Verisign contract
Hello Marilyn,
Sunday, March 25, 2001, 3:30:51 PM, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> Ah, you're right, I should have been clearer about the forum language.
> Well, maybe then, there is that flexibility if enough concur. But, can you
> live with his original language, though?
I don't see it as representative of the consensus of the GA.
It implies that the GA thinks a change in the policy for .org IS
something that should be considered provided that existing registrants
aren't required to give up their names.
I haven't seen any such consensus here on that, nor do I think that
statement is appropriate or reflective of the sense of the GA.
--
Best regards,
William mailto:william@userfriendly.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|